Abstract
A nitrogenous bio-fertilizer comibination was prepared contain Azospirillum lipoferum, and Azotobacter chroococcum bacteria. A phosphate bio-fertilizer consisting of Bacillus megaterium and Glomus mosseae fungus was also prepared. vermicompost was produced from earthworms imported from Iran and others isolated locally. A factorial experiment was carried to evaluate the effect of the interaction between these combinations and vermicompost types under levels of 0%, 25% and 50% of NPK. The results showed a significant superiority of the bio-fertilizer (nitrogen and phosphate) treatment in available nitrogen in the soil after harvest, number of tubers, yield per plant , and the total yield with 39.70 mg N kg -1, 11.03 tuber plant -1, 1367.40 g plant-1, and 43.76 Mg ha-1 respectively. While phosphate bio fertilizer treatment giving available phosphorus in the soil by 22.74 Mg P kg -1 , vermicompost produced from imported earthworms was superior in giving available phosphate in the soil with value 22.74 mg p kg -1 . While the tri interaction was superior for all studied characteristics.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Combined nitrogen and phosphate biofertilizer gave superior soil available nitrogen after harvest.
- Taxon
- POTATO
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- bio-fertilizer (nitrogen and phosphate) treatmente0
- Outcome
- available nitrogen in the soil after harveste0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 39.70 mg N kg -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed a significant superiority of the bio-fertilizer (nitrogen and phosphate) treatment in available nitrogen in the soil after harvest, number of tubers, yield per plant , and the total yield with 39.70 mg N kg -1, 11.03 tuber plant -1, 1367.40 g plant-1, and 43.76 Mg ha-1 respectively”
t0“POTATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined biofertilizer gave superior tuber number.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- bio-fertilizer (nitrogen and phosphate) treatmente0
- Outcome
- number of tuberse0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 11.03 tuber plant -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed a significant superiority of the bio-fertilizer (nitrogen and phosphate) treatment in available nitrogen in the soil after harvest, number of tubers, yield per plant , and the total yield with 39.70 mg N kg -1, 11.03 tuber plant -1, 1367.40 g plant-1, and 43.76 Mg ha-1 respectively”
t0“POTATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined biofertilizer gave superior yield per plant.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- bio-fertilizer (nitrogen and phosphate) treatmente0
- Outcome
- yield per plante0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 1367.40 g plant-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed a significant superiority of the bio-fertilizer (nitrogen and phosphate) treatment in available nitrogen in the soil after harvest, number of tubers, yield per plant , and the total yield with 39.70 mg N kg -1, 11.03 tuber plant -1, 1367.40 g plant-1, and 43.76 Mg ha-1 respectively”
t0“POTATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined biofertilizer gave superior total yield.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- bio-fertilizer (nitrogen and phosphate) treatmente0
- Outcome
- total yielde0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 43.76 Mg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed a significant superiority of the bio-fertilizer (nitrogen and phosphate) treatment in available nitrogen in the soil after harvest, number of tubers, yield per plant , and the total yield with 39.70 mg N kg -1, 11.03 tuber plant -1, 1367.40 g plant-1, and 43.76 Mg ha-1 respectively”
t0“POTATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphate biofertilizer produced the stated soil available phosphorus level.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- phosphate bio fertilizer treatmente0
- Outcome
- available phosphorus in the soile0
- Value
- 22.74 Mg P kg -1e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“phosphate bio fertilizer treatment giving available phosphorus in the soil by 22.74 Mg P kg -1”
t0“POTATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost from imported earthworms was superior for soil available phosphate.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- vermicompost produced from imported earthwormse0
- Outcome
- available phosphate in the soile0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 22.74 mg p kg -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“vermicompost produced from imported earthworms was superior in giving available phosphate in the soil with value 22.74 mg p kg -1”
t0“POTATO”
Claim · model-written summary
The three-factor interaction was superior for all studied characteristics.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Outcome
- all studied characteristicse0
- Direction
- superiore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the tri interaction was superior for all studied characteristics”
t0“POTATO”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →nitrogen · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ
108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
128 papers more in this group
See all 132 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
41 papers more in this group
See all 45 papers →inoculation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
89 papers more in this group
See all 93 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.