Paper · 2020 · Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace

Features of the influence of copper nanoparticles and copper oxide on the formation of barley crop

Seregina, T.; Chernikova, O.; Mazhaysky, Yu.; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
59
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In addition to modern methods of agricultural technology, currently the achievements of selection and genetics are widely used, as well as modern nanotechnology and nanomaterials, to improve food production. One of the forms of biologically active nanomaterials is metal nanopowders and their derivatives. The application is carried out in minimal doses that can significantly reduce costs in agricultural production. Improving the yield and quality of crops by optimizing nutrition and plant protection using nanotechnology and nanomaterials will solve not only the problems of increasing the yield and quality of farmed products, but also environmental problems. The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of copper and copper oxide nanoparticles on the formation of a barley crop. Under the conditions of a lysimetric experiment, the effect of presowing treatment of spring barley seeds by nanoparticles of copper and copper oxide on the growth and development of plants, yield, and their nutritional value was studied. The used nanoparticles have the following characteristics: Cu - 40–60 nm, phase composition: Cu - 100%; CuO - 40–60 nm, phase composition: CuO - 100%. A suspension of nanoparticles was obtained by dispersion by ultrasound in an aqueous solution. Nanopowders of copper and copper oxide in the solution contained 0.01 g per hectare seed rate. Barley seeds were soaked 30 minutes before sowing in double distilled water (control variant), as well as in a suspension of nanoparticles. Presowing treatment of barley seeds by Cu nanoparticles contributed to the intensification of growth processes, as well as an increase in green mass. The use of copper nanoparticles contributed to an increase in grain yield by 17.3% compared with the control, while there was no decrease in nutritional value: metabolic energy, feed units, digested protein. Based on the research results, it is preferable to use copper nanoparticles in comparison with copper oxide nanoparticles to obtain a higher barley yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presowing Cu nanoparticle treatment of barley seeds intensified growth processes relative to the control

Treatment
Presowing treatment of barley seeds by Cu nanoparticlese1
Outcome
growth processese1
Direction
intensificatione1
Comparator
control variante2
Setting
lysimetric experimente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Presowing treatment of barley seeds by Cu nanoparticles contributed to the intensification of growth processes, as well as an increase in green mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1666 · show in text ↑
e2

“Barley seeds were soaked 30 minutes before sowing in double distilled water (control variant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1471 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under the conditions of a lysimetric experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presowing Cu nanoparticle treatment of barley seeds increased green mass relative to the control

Treatment
Presowing treatment of barley seeds by Cu nanoparticlese1
Outcome
green masse1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
control variante2
Setting
lysimetric experimente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Presowing treatment of barley seeds by Cu nanoparticles contributed to the intensification of growth processes, as well as an increase in green mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1666 · show in text ↑
e2

“Barley seeds were soaked 30 minutes before sowing in double distilled water (control variant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1471 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under the conditions of a lysimetric experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper nanoparticles increased barley grain yield by 17.3% compared with the control

Treatment
copper nanoparticlese4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Value
17.3%e4
Comparator
controle4
Setting
lysimetric experimente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“formation of barley crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–98 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of copper nanoparticles contributed to an increase in grain yield by 17.3% compared with the control, while there was no decrease in nutritional value: metabolic energy, feed units, digested protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1874 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under the conditions of a lysimetric experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper nanoparticle use did not decrease barley nutritional value (metabolic energy, feed units, digested protein) relative to the control

Treatment
copper nanoparticlese4
Outcome
nutritional value: metabolic energy, feed units, digested proteine4
Direction
no decreasee4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“formation of barley crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–98 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of copper nanoparticles contributed to an increase in grain yield by 17.3% compared with the control, while there was no decrease in nutritional value: metabolic energy, feed units, digested protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1874 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Copper nanoparticles are preferable to copper oxide nanoparticles for obtaining a higher barley yield

Treatment
copper nanoparticlese5
Outcome
higher barley yielde5
Comparator
copper oxide nanoparticlese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“it is preferable to use copper nanoparticles in comparison with copper oxide nanoparticles to obtain a higher barley yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1907–2029 · show in text ↑

copper atom · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

copper atom · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

copper atom · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 8 positive, 18 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 25 positive, 10 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

37 papers: 37 positive, 0 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.