Paper · 2016 · IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

EVALUATION BREAD WHEAT PURE LINES UNDER EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SEEDING RATES

Baktash & Naes

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This research was carried out at the Swerah Research Station –Office of Agricultural Researches during 2014-2015 seasons. The objective of this research was evaluation bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes ,which concluded 15 pure lines in seventh generation, which developed by half dialld method between 6 parents ,The experiment was conducted using split plot arrangement with RCBD design with three replicates ,The main plots content four seeding rates (120, 160, 200 and 240 kg.ha-1 ), while the 21 genotypes occupied sub plots .The two pure lines S97 and S148 superoired to all other genotypes except A4.10 and Abu-Ghraib in grain yield which, produced 6.35 and 6.09 t.ha-1 .Increasing seeding rates caused early flowering, increased plant height, biological yield and harvest index. Significant differences were found in all the studied characters due to genotypes and seeding rates interaction. The pure line S148 ,using 200 kg.ha-1 seeding rates produced highest grain yield (7.49 t.ha-1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pure lines S97 and S148 outyielded all other genotypes except A4.10 and Abu-Ghraib in grain yield (6.35 and 6.09 t/ha).

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
S97 and S148e2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
superoirede2
Value
6.35 and 6.09 t.ha-1e2
Comparator
all other genotypes except A4.10 and Abu-Ghraibe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“evaluation bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–212 · show in text ↑
e2

“The two pure lines S97 and S148 superoired to all other genotypes except A4.10 and Abu-Ghraib in grain yield which, produced 6.35 and 6.09 t.ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seeding rates caused early flowering in bread wheat.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Increasing seeding ratese3
Outcome
early floweringe3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“evaluation bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–212 · show in text ↑
e3

“Increasing seeding rates caused early flowering, increased plant height, biological yield and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seeding rates increased plant height, biological yield and harvest index of bread wheat.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Increasing seeding ratese3
Outcome
plant height, biological yield and harvest indexe3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“evaluation bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–212 · show in text ↑
e3

“Increasing seeding rates caused early flowering, increased plant height, biological yield and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–795 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype and seeding rate interaction produced significant differences in all studied characters of bread wheat.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
genotypes and seeding rates interactione4
Outcome
all the studied characterse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“evaluation bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–212 · show in text ↑
e4

“Significant differences were found in all the studied characters due to genotypes and seeding rates interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pure line S148 at 200 kg/ha seeding rate gave the highest grain yield (7.49 t/ha) in bread wheat.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
S148e5
Treatment
200 kg.ha-1 seeding ratese5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
higheste5
Value
7.49 t.ha-1e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“evaluation bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–212 · show in text ↑
e5

“The pure line S148 ,using 200 kg.ha-1 seeding rates produced highest grain yield (7.49 t.ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1004 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.