Paper · 2020 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Heat stability of winter wheat depends on cultivars, timing and protective methods

Qiang LI; Xu-hong CHANG; Xiang-hai MENG; et al.

15
claims
34
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Heat stress negatively affects wheat production in many regions of the world. At present, sensitivity to heat stress remains one of the least understood aspects of wheat genetics and breeding, and measures for preventing heat stress are understudied. In this study, we used three cultivars of winter wheat (GY2018, SL02-1 and SY20) to evaluate the effect of heat stress at different days after anthesis (DAA) on yield and quality. Heat stability of the cultivars were analyzed and evaluated for the effects of two kinds of regulators on wheat under heat stress conditions. Heat treatment at 7 DAA led to the most substantial reduction in yield while GY2018 had the best heat stability with respect to yield, and demonstrated the most positive effects on several quality traits including protein content, sedimentation volume and glutenin and gliadin contents. Heat treatment at 14 DAA had the least reduction in yield, while SY20 had the best heat stability with respect to yield and heat treatment had minimal effects on quality. Heat treatment at 21 DAA had only a limited effect on yield, while SL02-1 had the best heat stability with respect to yield, but it showed the most negative effects on quality. Stable time at 14 DAA and protein content at 21 DAA can be used as indicators for detecting the stability of quality under heat stress. Among the three studied cultivars, SY20 was the most sensitive to heat stress with the stable time decreasing from 26.4 to 9.1 min, a higher sedimentation volume at 7 DAA, and a lower γ-gliadin content which increased 2.4-fold under high-temperature treatment. The addition of various regulators had different effects: potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KDP) was more protective of yield with heat stress at 7 DAA, while Duntianbao (DTB) had better effects on quality with heat stress at 21 DAA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat at 7 DAA caused the greatest yield reduction.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Heat treatment at 7 DAAe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat treatment at 7 DAA led to the most substantial reduction in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GY2018 had the best yield heat stability at 7 DAA.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
GY2018e0
Outcome
heat stability with respect to yielde0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GY2018 had the best heat stability with respect to yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GY2018 showed the most positive heat effects on protein content, sedimentation volume, glutenin and gliadin contents.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
GY2018t1
Outcome
protein content, sedimentation volume and glutenin and gliadin contentse0
Direction
most positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“demonstrated the most positive effects on several quality traits including protein content, sedimentation volume and glutenin and gliadin contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
t1

“while GY2018 had the best heat stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat at 14 DAA caused the least yield reduction.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Heat treatment at 14 DAAe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat treatment at 14 DAA had the least reduction in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SY20 had the best yield heat stability at 14 DAA.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
SY20e0
Outcome
heat stability with respect to yielde0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SY20 had the best heat stability with respect to yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat at 14 DAA had minimal quality effects.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
minimale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heat treatment had minimal effects on quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat at 21 DAA had limited effect on yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Heat treatment at 21 DAAe0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat treatment at 21 DAA had only a limited effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SL02-1 had the best yield stability at 21 DAA.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
SL02-1e0
Outcome
heat stability with respect to yielde0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SL02-1 had the best heat stability with respect to yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SL02-1 had the most negative heat effect on quality.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
SL02-1t1
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
most negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it showed the most negative effects on quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
t1

“while SL02-1 had the best heat stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1132 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Stable time at 14 DAA and protein content at 21 DAA were proposed as quality-stability indicators.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
indicators for detecting the stability of quality under heat stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stable time at 14 DAA and protein content at 21 DAA can be used as indicators for detecting the stability of quality under heat stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SY20 stable time decreased from 26.4 to 9.1 min under heat stress.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
SY20e0
Outcome
stable timee0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
26.4 to 9.1 mine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SY20 was the most sensitive to heat stress with the stable time decreasing from 26.4 to 9.1 min”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SY20 had higher sedimentation volume at 7 DAA.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
SY20t1
Outcome
sedimentation volumee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher sedimentation volume at 7 DAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
t1

“Among the three studied cultivars, SY20 was the most sensitive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SY20 γ-gliadin content increased 2.4-fold under high temperature.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
SY20t1
Treatment
high-temperature treatmente0
Outcome
γ-gliadin contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.4-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a lower γ-gliadin content which increased 2.4-fold under high-temperature treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
t1

“Among the three studied cultivars, SY20 was the most sensitive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KDP protected yield under heat stress at 7 DAA.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KDP)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
more protectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KDP) was more protective of yield with heat stress at 7 DAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1754 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DTB better protected quality under heat stress at 21 DAA.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Duntianbao (DTB)e0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Duntianbao (DTB) had better effects on quality with heat stress at 21 DAA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1762–1836 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–30 · show in text ↑

potassium dihydrogen phosphate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

heat · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

309 papers: 54 positive, 255 negative or no effect

254 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

305 papers more in this group

See all 309 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.