Paper · 2020 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Organic Manures and Industrial by-Products Influence the Yield Attributes and Yield of Sugarcane

D. Venkatakrishnan; S. Manimaran

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of organic manures and industrial by-products on cane productivity. The soil type of experimental site was sandy loam. The treatments consisted of T1 – Seasoned pressmud @ 25 t ha-1, T2 – T1 + Lignite flyash @ 25 t ha-1, T3 – T1 + Vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1, T4 – Vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1 + Lignite flyash @ 25 t ha-1, T5 – Biocompost @ 5 t ha-1, T6 – T5 + Lignite flyash @ 25 t ha-1, T7 – FYM @ 10 t ha-1, T8 – NPK alone (RDF). The results revealed that yield attributes and cane yield improved in addition of organic manures and industrial by-products. The addition of integrating Vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1 + Seasoned Pressmud @ 25 t ha-1 along with RDF (T3) significantly recorded yield attributes of (125.83 ´ 1000) of millable cane ha-1, 2.57 cm of cane girth, 27.82 internodes cane-1, 1.37 kg of individual cane weight and cane yield of 165.18 t ha-1. It was observed that vermicompost, seasoned pressmud and chemical fertilizers enhanced yield attributes and yield of sugarcane.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost with seasoned pressmud and RDF significantly recorded 125.83 thousand millable cane per hectare.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1 + Seasoned Pressmud @ 25 t ha-1 along with RDF (T3)e2
Outcome
millable cane ha-1e2
Direction
significantly recordede2
Value
125.83 ´ 1000e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“The addition of integrating Vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1 + Seasoned Pressmud @ 25 t ha-1 along with RDF (T3) significantly recorded yield attributes of (125.83 ´ 1000) of millable cane ha-1, 2.57 cm of cane girth, 27.82 internodes cane-1, 1.37 kg of individual cane weight and cane yield of 165.18 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield of Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost with seasoned pressmud and RDF significantly recorded a cane girth of 2.57 cm.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1 + Seasoned Pressmud @ 25 t ha-1 along with RDF (T3)e2
Outcome
cane girthe2
Direction
significantly recordede2
Value
2.57 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“The addition of integrating Vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1 + Seasoned Pressmud @ 25 t ha-1 along with RDF (T3) significantly recorded yield attributes of (125.83 ´ 1000) of millable cane ha-1, 2.57 cm of cane girth, 27.82 internodes cane-1, 1.37 kg of individual cane weight and cane yield of 165.18 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield of Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost with seasoned pressmud and RDF significantly recorded 27.82 internodes per cane.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1 + Seasoned Pressmud @ 25 t ha-1 along with RDF (T3)e2
Outcome
internodes cane-1e2
Direction
significantly recordede2
Value
27.82e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“The addition of integrating Vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1 + Seasoned Pressmud @ 25 t ha-1 along with RDF (T3) significantly recorded yield attributes of (125.83 ´ 1000) of millable cane ha-1, 2.57 cm of cane girth, 27.82 internodes cane-1, 1.37 kg of individual cane weight and cane yield of 165.18 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield of Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost with seasoned pressmud and RDF significantly recorded an individual cane weight of 1.37 kg.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1 + Seasoned Pressmud @ 25 t ha-1 along with RDF (T3)e2
Outcome
individual cane weighte2
Direction
significantly recordede2
Value
1.37 kge2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“The addition of integrating Vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1 + Seasoned Pressmud @ 25 t ha-1 along with RDF (T3) significantly recorded yield attributes of (125.83 ´ 1000) of millable cane ha-1, 2.57 cm of cane girth, 27.82 internodes cane-1, 1.37 kg of individual cane weight and cane yield of 165.18 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield of Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost with seasoned pressmud and RDF significantly recorded a cane yield of 165.18 t/ha.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1 + Seasoned Pressmud @ 25 t ha-1 along with RDF (T3)e2
Outcome
cane yielde2
Direction
significantly recordede2
Value
165.18 t ha-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“The addition of integrating Vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1 + Seasoned Pressmud @ 25 t ha-1 along with RDF (T3) significantly recorded yield attributes of (125.83 ´ 1000) of millable cane ha-1, 2.57 cm of cane girth, 27.82 internodes cane-1, 1.37 kg of individual cane weight and cane yield of 165.18 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield of Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures and industrial by-products improved yield attributes and cane yield of sugarcane.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
organic manures and industrial by-productse1
Outcome
yield attributes and cane yielde1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“yield attributes and cane yield improved in addition of organic manures and industrial by-products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–605 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield of Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost, seasoned pressmud and chemical fertilizers enhanced yield attributes and yield of sugarcane.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
vermicompost, seasoned pressmud and chemical fertilizerse3
Outcome
yield attributes and yielde3
Direction
enhancede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“It was observed that vermicompost, seasoned pressmud and chemical fertilizers enhanced yield attributes and yield of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield of Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–96 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.