Paper · 2020 · AMB Express

Herbicidal efficacy of harzianums produced by the biofertilizer fungus, Trichoderma brevicompactum

Miaomiao Yin; Opemipo Esther Fasoyin; Chen Wang; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Herbicides are important tools for weed control in modern agriculture. In the search for potential herbicidal natural products from fungal species, harzianum A and B were identified from the biofertilizer fungus, Trichoderma brevicompactum . In the phytotoxicity assays on the dicot species Brassica chinensis , harzianum A and B reduced both shoot and root lengths at low concentrations and inhibited the seed germination at 2 μg mL −1 . In addition, harzianum A and B also exhibited phytotoxicity against monocots, Oryza sativa L. cv. Nipponbare and Echinochloa crusgalli L. Beauv.. Compared with a common herbicide, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, harzianum A and B performed similar activity in a pot assay, and were more effective in post-emergence than pre-emergence conditions. Harzianum A and B have potential as efficient herbicide for controlling important dicotyledon and monocotyledon weeds at low concentrations. They can be sprayed in liquid form in both pre- and post-emergence conditions. Our results confirmed the importance of these molecules for the development of new herbicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harzianum A reduced shoot and root lengths in Brassica chinensis.

Taxon
Brassica chinensisBrassica rapa subsp. chinensise1
Treatment
harzianum Ae0
Outcome
shoot and root lengthse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
low concentrationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis · Taxonおむこさん志望 · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harzianum A and B reduced both shoot and root lengths at low concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“dicot species Brassica chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harzianum B reduced shoot and root lengths in Brassica chinensis.

Taxon
Brassica chinensisBrassica rapa subsp. chinensise1
Treatment
Be0
Outcome
shoot and root lengthse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis · Taxonおむこさん志望 · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harzianum A and B reduced both shoot and root lengths at low concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“dicot species Brassica chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harzianum A inhibited seed germination at 2 μg mL −1.

Taxon
Brassica chinensisBrassica rapa subsp. chinensise1
Treatment
harzianum Ae0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
2 μg mL −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis · Taxonおむこさん志望 · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harzianum A and B reduced both shoot and root lengths at low concentrations and inhibited the seed germination at 2 μg mL −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–445 · show in text ↑
e1

“dicot species Brassica chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harzianum B inhibited seed germination at 2 μg mL −1.

Taxon
Brassica chinensisBrassica rapa subsp. chinensise1
Treatment
Be0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
2 μg mL −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis · Taxonおむこさん志望 · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harzianum A and B reduced both shoot and root lengths at low concentrations and inhibited the seed germination at 2 μg mL −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–445 · show in text ↑
e1

“dicot species Brassica chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–318 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harzianum A and B showed phytotoxicity against rice.

Taxon
Brassica chinensisBrassica rapa subsp. chinensise1
Treatment
harzianum A and Be0
Outcome
phytotoxicity against monocotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis · Taxonおむこさん志望 · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harzianum A and B also exhibited phytotoxicity against monocots, Oryza sativa L. cv. Nipponbare and Echinochloa crusgalli L. Beauv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–592 · show in text ↑
e1

“dicot species Brassica chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–318 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harzianum A and B had similar pot-assay activity to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid.

Taxon
Brassica chinensisBrassica rapa subsp. chinensise1
Outcome
similar activitye0
Comparator
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acide0
Setting
pot assaye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis · Taxonおむこさん志望 · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with a common herbicide, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, harzianum A and B performed similar activity in a pot assay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–719 · show in text ↑
e1

“dicot species Brassica chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–318 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harzianum A and B were more effective after emergence than before emergence.

Taxon
Brassica chinensisBrassica rapa subsp. chinensise1
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
pre-emergence conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis · Taxonおむこさん志望 · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were more effective in post-emergence than pre-emergence conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–792 · show in text ↑
e1

“dicot species Brassica chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–318 · show in text ↑

boron atom · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Growth of plants receiving no boron was drastically impaired compared with plants receiving 0.1–5.0 ppm boron.

    INFLUENCE OF BORON NUTRITION ON GLUCOSINOLATES AND REDUCING SUGARS OF TURNIP · 1982 · compared with plants receiving 0.1–5.0 ppm boron

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.