Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of bio-inoculant, organic manure and chemical fertilizer on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Mayuri Thakur; HP Agrawal; JR Patel; et al.

3
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during Rabi season 2018-19 at Instructional Farm, BTC College of Agriculture and Research Station, Bilaspur to to study the effect of bio-inoculant, organic manure and chemical fertilizer on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The wheat (var. CG-1013) was grown and treatments were replicated three times in randomized block design. The experiment consists of twelve treatments viz., 100% RDF (T1), 75% RDF (T2), 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 (T3), 75% RDF + Azotobacter (T4), 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobacter (T5), 75% RDF + Azotobacter + PSB (T6), 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobacter + PSB (T7), 50% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 (T8), 50% RDF + Azotobacter (T9), 50% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobacter (T10), 50% RDF + Azotobacter + PSB (T11), 50% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1+ Azotobacter + PSB (T12). The soil of the experimental field was clay in texture. The result revealed that growth parameters viz., plant population (m-2), plant height (cm), number of tillers (m-2), number of effective tillers (m-2) and dry matter accumulation (g plant-1) were recorded maximum with the application of 100% RDF (T1) which was at par with the application of 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobacter + PSB (T7) and was significantly superior over all treatments at all stages of observations. The improvement in yield attributes and yield of wheat was recorded with the application of 100% RDF (T1) which was at par with the application of 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobacter + PSB (T7).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant population, plant height and number of tillers were maximum with 100% RDF (T1), at par with 75% RDF + FYM + Azotobacter + PSB (T7), and significantly superior to all other treatments.

Treatment
100% RDF (T1)e1
Outcome
plant population (m-2), plant height (cm), number of tillers (m-2)e0
Direction
maximume1
Qualifier
at par with the application of 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobacter + PSB (T7)e2
Comparator
all treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant population (m-2), plant height (cm), number of tillers (m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1006 · show in text ↑
e1

“were recorded maximum with the application of 100% RDF (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1141 · show in text ↑
e2

“at par with the application of 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobacter + PSB (T7) and was significantly superior over all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of effective tillers and dry matter accumulation were maximum with 100% RDF (T1), at par with 75% RDF + FYM + Azotobacter + PSB (T7), and significantly superior to all other treatments.

Treatment
100% RDF (T1)e1
Outcome
number of effective tillers (m-2) and dry matter accumulation (g plant-1)e0
Direction
maximume1
Qualifier
at par with the application of 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobacter + PSB (T7)e2
Comparator
all treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“number of effective tillers (m-2) and dry matter accumulation (g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1081 · show in text ↑
e1

“were recorded maximum with the application of 100% RDF (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1141 · show in text ↑
e2

“at par with the application of 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobacter + PSB (T7) and was significantly superior over all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield attributes and yield of wheat improved with 100% RDF (T1), at par with 75% RDF + FYM + Azotobacter + PSB (T7).

Treatment
100% RDF (T1)e0
Outcome
yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
at par with the application of 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobacter + PSB (T7)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“The improvement in yield attributes and yield of wheat was recorded with the application of 100% RDF (T1) which was at par with the application of 75% RDF + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + Azotobacter + PSB (T7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1511 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

84 papers: 63 positive, 21 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.