Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Influences of organic and inorganic fertilizers on productivity and soil fertility of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Typic Ustochrept soil of Uttar Pradesh

V. Singh; NS Rana; BP Dhyani; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was conducted to assess fertilizer effect on wheat yield and soil fertility with the following treatments; T1- Control, T2- 100 % NPK, T3-75 % NPK + FYM, T4- 75 % NPK + FYM + PSB+ Azotobactor, T5- 100 % NPK + Zn, T6- 100 % NPK + Zn+ Mn, T7-100 % NPK + Zn + Mn + Fe, T8-75 % NPK + FYM+ PSB+ Azotobactor + Zn + Fe + Mn, T9-125 % NPK, T10- 125% NPK + Zn, T11- 125 % NPK + Zn+ Mn, T12-125% NPK + Zn + Mn + Fe, T13-100% NPK + FYM+ PSB+ Azotobactor + Zn + Fe + Mn and T14-50% N +100%PK + FYM+ PSB+ Azotobactor + Zn + Fe + Mn + LCC based N top dressing. Treatments differed significantly in influencing soil fertility and grain and straw yields of wheat crop. The study indicated that addition of 100% NPK + FYM + PSB + Azotobactor+ Zn + Fe + Mn recorded significantly higher value of growth and yield attributes in terms of plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g m-1), number of effective tillers (m-2) and yield attributes character grains spike-1,1000-grain weight (g), harvest index (%), grain yield (58.40 q ha-1) and straw yield (83.9 q ha-1) followed by 125% NPK + Zn+ Mn grain yield (57.9 q ha-1) and straw (82.9 q ha-1).The content of organic carbon increase with the combined application of organic and inorganic with biofertilizer. Integration of 100% NPK + FYM + Azotobactor + Zn + Mn + Fe was found more productivity and remvaerative with the higher residual soil fertility status after wheat crop. Based on the study, 100% NPK + FYM + Azotobactor + Zn+ Mn+ Fe could be recommended for attaining maximum wheat crop productivity and sustainability of soil under semi-arid and sub-tropical sandy loam.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatments significantly differed in soil fertility and wheat grain and straw yield.

Treatment
Treatmentse0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments differed significantly in influencing soil fertility and grain and straw yields of wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated treatment gave significantly higher growth and yield attributes.

Treatment
100% NPK + FYM + PSB + Azotobactor+ Zn + Fe + Mne0
Outcome
growth and yield attributese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of 100% NPK + FYM + PSB + Azotobactor+ Zn + Fe + Mn recorded significantly higher value of growth and yield attributes in terms of plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g m-1), number of effective tillers (m-2) and yield attributes character grains spike-1,1000-grain weight (g), harvest index (%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated treatment produced grain yield of 58.40 q ha-1.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
58.40 q ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (58.40 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated treatment produced straw yield of 83.9 q ha-1.

Outcome
straw yielde0
Value
83.9 q ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw yield (83.9 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125% NPK plus zinc and manganese treatment gave grain yield of 57.9 q ha-1.

Treatment
125% NPK + Zn+ Mne0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
57.9 q ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“125% NPK + Zn+ Mn grain yield (57.9 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125% NPK plus zinc and manganese treatment gave straw yield of 82.9 q ha-1.

Outcome
strawe0
Value
82.9 q ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw (82.9 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining organic and inorganic fertilizer with biofertilizer increased soil organic carbon.

Treatment
combined application of organic and inorganic with biofertilizere0
Outcome
content of organic carbone0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The content of organic carbon increase with the combined application of organic and inorganic with biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated fertilizer treatment gave greater productivity and residual soil fertility.

Treatment
100% NPK + FYM + Azotobactor + Zn + Mn + Fee0
Outcome
productivity and remvaerativee0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integration of 100% NPK + FYM + Azotobactor + Zn + Mn + Fe was found more productivity and remvaerative with the higher residual soil fertility status after wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1418 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the integrated fertilizer treatment for maximum wheat productivity and soil sustainability.

Treatment
100% NPK + FYM + Azotobactor + Zn+ Mn+ Fee0
Outcome
maximum wheat crop productivity and sustainability of soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% NPK + FYM + Azotobactor + Zn+ Mn+ Fe could be recommended for attaining maximum wheat crop productivity and sustainability of soil under semi-arid and sub-tropical sandy loam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1619 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

65 papers: 61 positive, 4 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 44 positive, 5 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.