Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

The Influence of Plant Growth Regulator and Rootstocks on Budding in Greenhouse Rose (Rosa hybrida L.) cv. First Red

Prabhjit Kaur; H. S. Grewal; R. K. Dubey; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study of different cytokinin treatments and rootstocks on budding in greenhouse cultivars of rose (Rosa hybrida L.) was conducted at Research farm of department of Floriculture and Landscaping, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab) during (2016-17). Three rootstocks (R. indica, R. multiflora and R. bourboniana) and scion of cv. First Red were taken for the experiment and treated with different cytokinin (BAP) concentrations viz., 5 mg L-1, 10 mg L-1, 15 mg L-1, 20 mg L-1 and control. The maximum sprouting (91.66 %), survival (86.67 %), rooting (95.00 %), plant height (23.01 cm), shoot length (15.01 cm), number of branches (3.53), leaves (9.95) and flowers (2.21) per plant were significantly differed with rootstocks during both the year of experimentation. However, days to flower, bud emergence and full bloom were non-significant with cytokinin treatments in all the rootstocks. The BAP 20 mg L-1 and rootstock R. indica found best for all the parameters among all cytokinin treatments and rootstocks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks significantly differed in maximum sprouting of 91.66%.

Taxon
rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Rosa hybrid cultivare1
Material
rootstockse0
Outcome
sproutinge0
Value
91.66 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum sprouting (91.66 %), survival (86.67 %), rooting (95.00 %), plant height (23.01 cm), shoot length (15.01 cm), number of branches (3.53), leaves (9.95) and flowers (2.21) per plant were significantly differed with rootstocks during both the year of experimentation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–781 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse cultivars of rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks significantly differed in maximum survival of 86.67%.

Taxon
rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Rosa hybrid cultivare1
Material
rootstockse0
Outcome
survivale0
Value
86.67 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum sprouting (91.66 %), survival (86.67 %), rooting (95.00 %), plant height (23.01 cm), shoot length (15.01 cm), number of branches (3.53), leaves (9.95) and flowers (2.21) per plant were significantly differed with rootstocks during both the year of experimentation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–781 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse cultivars of rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks significantly differed in maximum rooting of 95.00%.

Taxon
rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Rosa hybrid cultivare1
Material
rootstockse0
Outcome
rootinge0
Value
95.00 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum sprouting (91.66 %), survival (86.67 %), rooting (95.00 %), plant height (23.01 cm), shoot length (15.01 cm), number of branches (3.53), leaves (9.95) and flowers (2.21) per plant were significantly differed with rootstocks during both the year of experimentation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–781 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse cultivars of rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks significantly differed in maximum plant height of 23.01 cm.

Taxon
rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Rosa hybrid cultivare1
Material
rootstockse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Value
23.01 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum sprouting (91.66 %), survival (86.67 %), rooting (95.00 %), plant height (23.01 cm), shoot length (15.01 cm), number of branches (3.53), leaves (9.95) and flowers (2.21) per plant were significantly differed with rootstocks during both the year of experimentation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–781 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse cultivars of rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks significantly differed in maximum shoot length of 15.01 cm.

Taxon
rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Rosa hybrid cultivare1
Material
rootstockse0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Value
15.01 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum sprouting (91.66 %), survival (86.67 %), rooting (95.00 %), plant height (23.01 cm), shoot length (15.01 cm), number of branches (3.53), leaves (9.95) and flowers (2.21) per plant were significantly differed with rootstocks during both the year of experimentation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–781 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse cultivars of rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks significantly differed in maximum branches per plant of 3.53.

Taxon
rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Rosa hybrid cultivare1
Material
rootstockse0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Value
3.53e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum sprouting (91.66 %), survival (86.67 %), rooting (95.00 %), plant height (23.01 cm), shoot length (15.01 cm), number of branches (3.53), leaves (9.95) and flowers (2.21) per plant were significantly differed with rootstocks during both the year of experimentation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–781 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse cultivars of rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks significantly differed in maximum leaves per plant of 9.95.

Taxon
rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Rosa hybrid cultivare1
Material
rootstockse0
Outcome
leavese0
Value
9.95e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum sprouting (91.66 %), survival (86.67 %), rooting (95.00 %), plant height (23.01 cm), shoot length (15.01 cm), number of branches (3.53), leaves (9.95) and flowers (2.21) per plant were significantly differed with rootstocks during both the year of experimentation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–781 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse cultivars of rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks significantly differed in maximum flowers per plant of 2.21.

Taxon
rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Rosa hybrid cultivare1
Material
rootstockse0
Outcome
flowerse0
Value
2.21e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum sprouting (91.66 %), survival (86.67 %), rooting (95.00 %), plant height (23.01 cm), shoot length (15.01 cm), number of branches (3.53), leaves (9.95) and flowers (2.21) per plant were significantly differed with rootstocks during both the year of experimentation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–781 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse cultivars of rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cytokinin treatments did not significantly affect days to flower, bud emergence or full bloom across rootstocks.

Taxon
rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Rosa hybrid cultivare1
Material
rootstockse0
Treatment
cytokinin treatmentse0
Outcome
days to flower, bud emergence and full bloome0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“days to flower, bud emergence and full bloom were non-significant with cytokinin treatments in all the rootstocks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–905 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse cultivars of rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BAP at 20 mg L-1 was rated best for all measured parameters.

Taxon
rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Rosa hybrid cultivare1
Treatment
BAP 20 mg L-1e0
Outcome
best for all the parameterse0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
all cytokinin treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The BAP 20 mg L-1 and rootstock R. indica found best for all the parameters among all cytokinin treatments and rootstocks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1028 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse cultivars of rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. indica was rated best for all measured parameters.

Taxon
rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Rosa hybrid cultivare1
Material
R. indicae0
Outcome
best for all the parameterse0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
rootstockse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The BAP 20 mg L-1 and rootstock R. indica found best for all the parameters among all cytokinin treatments and rootstocks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1028 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse cultivars of rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–119 · show in text ↑

class · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.