Paper · 2020 · Agronomy Journal

Interseeding cover crops in corn: Establishment, biomass, and competitiveness in on‐farm trials

Aaron P. Brooker; Karen A. Renner; Bruno Basso

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
28
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Broadcast interseeding cover crops in corn ( Zea mays L.) from the V2–V7 corn growth stages provides farmers the opportunity to establish cover crops over large areas quickly compared with drill interseeders. The objectives of this research were to evaluate broadcast interseeded cover crop establishment and biomass production as well as cover crop effect on corn grain yield in farmer's fields in Michigan. In 2017 and 2018, annual ryegrass ( Lolium multiflorum Lam.), crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.), and oilseed radish ( Raphanus sativus L.) were broadcast interseeded at the V3 and V6 corn growth stages in nine farm fields. Cover crop density was measured 30 d after interseeding; cover crop density and biomass were measured in October prior to grain corn harvest. Cover crop density varied across site‐years; annual ryegrass usually had the highest density. Fall biomass production of oilseed radish was usually equal to or greater than annual ryegrass and crimson clover biomass. Rainfall during the interseeding period improved cover crop emergence. Cover crop density and biomass were higher in sites that were tilled prior to corn planting compared with no‐till, likely due to better seed to soil contact. Grain yield did not differ in the cover crop vs. no cover crop control treatments. Successfully establishing cover crops by broadcast interseeding in corn is dependent on specific location conditions; conventional tillage and rainfall improved establishment and biomass production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual ryegrass usually had the highest cover crop density.

Material
annual ryegrasse0
Outcome
densitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“annual ryegrass usually had the highest density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oilseed radish fall biomass was usually at least as high as annual ryegrass and crimson clover.

Material
oilseed radishe0
Outcome
Fall biomass productione0
Direction
equal to or greater thane0
Comparator
annual ryegrass and crimson clovere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fall biomass production of oilseed radish was usually equal to or greater than annual ryegrass and crimson clover biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall during interseeding improved cover crop emergence.

Treatment
Rainfall during the interseeding periode0
Outcome
cover crop emergencee0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rainfall during the interseeding period improved cover crop emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior tillage produced higher cover crop density and biomass than no-till.

Treatment
tilled prior to corn plantinge0
Outcome
Cover crop density and biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no‐tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cover crop density and biomass were higher in sites that were tilled prior to corn planting compared with no‐till”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield did not differ between cover crop and no-cover-crop treatments.

Treatment
cover crope0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
no cover crop control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield did not differ in the cover crop vs. no cover crop control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

94 papers: 60 positive, 34 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

cover crop · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 104 positive, 118 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.