Paper · 2020 · Revista Ciência Agrícola

SOWING DATES AND MOLYBDENUM FOLIAR APPLICATION FOR TWO PEANUT CULTIVARS

Sérgio Iraide Bernardes Soares Filho; Edson Lazarini; Valdeci Orioli Júnior; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The study aimed to assess application efficiency of Mo doses through leaves in two sowing dates and different phenological stages on agronomic characteristics of two peanut cultivars. The experimental design was a randomized block with four replications, with the treatments arranged in a factorial design 2 x 2 x 6 x 2, being two cultivars (IAC Tatu and IAC 886), two sowing dates, six Mo doses applied to the leaves (0, 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 g ha-1) and two application times (early flowering and early seed formation). Were evaluated the number of pods/plant, the number of grains/pod, the weight of 100 grains, the yield of grain, the pod production and protein, lipids and the Mo contents in the grains. The highest pod yields were obtained with sowing in November, for both cultivars. The IAC 886 presents a significantly higher production than IAC Tatu when sown in November. When the seeds were sown in March, the cultivars showed similar productions. Foliar application of Mo at flowering and pod formation did not affect the agronomic characteristics, protein and lipid contents in peanut grains. The increase in Mo doses increased the content of this micronutrient in the grains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest peanut pod yields were obtained with November sowing for both cultivars.

Treatment
sowing in Novembere1
Outcome
pod yieldse1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO PEANUT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest pod yields were obtained with sowing in November, for both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–793 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IAC 886 had significantly higher production than IAC Tatu when sown in November.

Material
IAC 886e2
Treatment
sown in Novembere2
Outcome
productione2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
IAC Tatue2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO PEANUT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“The IAC 886 presents a significantly higher production than IAC Tatu when sown in November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–885 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When sown in March, the two peanut cultivars showed similar productions.

Treatment
sown in Marche3
Outcome
productionse3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO PEANUT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“When the seeds were sown in March, the cultivars showed similar productions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Mo at flowering and pod formation did not affect agronomic characteristics, protein and lipid contents of peanut grains.

Organ / stage
grainse4
Treatment
Foliar application of Mo at flowering and pod formatione4
Outcome
agronomic characteristics, protein and lipid contentse4
Direction
did not affecte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO PEANUT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
e4

“Foliar application of Mo at flowering and pod formation did not affect the agronomic characteristics, protein and lipid contents in peanut grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Mo doses increased the Mo content of peanut grains.

Organ / stage
grainse5
Treatment
increase in Mo dosese5
Outcome
content of this micronutrient in the grainse5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO PEANUT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 · show in text ↑
e5

“The increase in Mo doses increased the content of this micronutrient in the grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1193 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

stage · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.