Paper · 2020 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Elevated CO2 has concurrent effects on leaf and grain metabolism but minimal effects on yield in wheat

Guillaume Tcherkez; Sinda Ben Mariem; Luis Larraya; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

While the general effect of CO2 enrichment on photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, N content, and yield has been documented, there is still some uncertainty as to whether there are interactive effects between CO2 enrichment and other factors, such as temperature, geographical location, water availability, and cultivar. In addition, the metabolic coordination between leaves and grains, which is crucial for crop responsiveness to elevated CO2, has never been examined closely. Here, we address these two aspects by multi-level analyses of data from several free-air CO2 enrichment experiments conducted in five different countries. There was little effect of elevated CO2 on yield (except in the USA), likely due to photosynthetic capacity acclimation, as reflected by protein profiles. In addition, there was a significant decrease in leaf amino acids (threonine) and macroelements (e.g. K) at elevated CO2, while other elements, such as Mg or S, increased. Despite the non-significant effect of CO2 enrichment on yield, grains appeared to be significantly depleted in N (as expected), but also in threonine, the S-containing amino acid methionine, and Mg. Overall, our results suggest a strong detrimental effect of CO2 enrichment on nutrient availability and remobilization from leaves to grains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 had little effect on wheat yield except in the USA.

Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
little effecte0
Setting
USAe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was little effect of elevated CO2 on yield (except in the USA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Elevated CO2 has concurrent effects on leaf and grain metabolism but minimal effects on yield in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 significantly decreased leaf threonine and K.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
leaf amino acids (threonine) and macroelements (e.g. K)e0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a significant decrease in leaf amino acids (threonine) and macroelements (e.g. K) at elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“Elevated CO2 has concurrent effects on leaf and grain metabolism but minimal effects on yield in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased Mg and S.

Treatment
elevated CO2e1
Outcome
Mg or Se0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“other elements, such as Mg or S, increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“Elevated CO2 has concurrent effects on leaf and grain metabolism but minimal effects on yield in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was little effect of elevated CO2 on yield (except in the USA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain N, threonine, methionine and Mg were significantly depleted under CO2 enrichment.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
CO2 enrichmente1
Outcome
N (as expected), but also in threonine, the S-containing amino acid methionine, and Mge0
Direction
depletede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grains appeared to be significantly depleted in N (as expected), but also in threonine, the S-containing amino acid methionine, and Mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“Elevated CO2 has concurrent effects on leaf and grain metabolism but minimal effects on yield in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Despite the non-significant effect of CO2 enrichment on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1023 · show in text ↑

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 23 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

co2 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

203 papers: 174 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 174 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

199 papers more in this group

See all 203 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.