Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Pest Management

Influence of row spacing and weed control methods on weed population dynamics in soybean (Glycine max L.)

Olumide Samuel Daramola; Olusegun Rapheal Adeyemi; Joseph Aremu Adigun; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Weed infestation is a major factor attributed for the poor yield of soybean. Field experiments were therefore conducted to evaluate the influence of row spacing and weed control methods on weed dynamics, seed yield and profitability of soybean. The use of 50 cm row spacing reduced the density and biomass of grass weed species including Digitaria horizontalis, Panicum maximum, Cynodon dactylon and Paspalum scrobiculatum with subsequently higher soybean dry matter, seed yield, revenue and marginal returns compared to 75 and 100 cm row spacing. However, some broad-leaved weed species like Commelina benghalensis, Gomphrena celosioides and Amaranthus spinosus were not controlled at 50 compared to 75 and 100 cm row spacing. Regardless of row spacing, herbicide (butachlor) application plus hoe weeding reduced total weed density and biomass with subsequently higher soybean dry matter, seed yield, revenue and marginal returns than two hoe weedings or sole herbicide application. The result suggests that narrow row spacing of 50 cm and integrated weed control by butachlor plus hoe weeding will improve weed control efficiency, productivity and profitability of soybean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty cm row spacing reduced the density and biomass of grass weed species compared with 75 and 100 cm row spacing.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
50 cm row spacinge1
Interactor
grass weed speciese1weed
Outcome
density and biomasse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
75 and 100 cm row spacinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of 50 cm row spacing reduced the density and biomass of grass weed species including Digitaria horizontalis, Panicum maximum, Cynodon dactylon and Paspalum scrobiculatum with subsequently higher soybean dry matter, seed yield, revenue and marginal returns compared to 75 and 100 cm row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty cm row spacing gave higher soybean dry matter and seed yield than 75 and 100 cm row spacing.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
50 cm row spacinge1
Outcome
soybean dry matter, seed yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
75 and 100 cm row spacinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of 50 cm row spacing reduced the density and biomass of grass weed species including Digitaria horizontalis, Panicum maximum, Cynodon dactylon and Paspalum scrobiculatum with subsequently higher soybean dry matter, seed yield, revenue and marginal returns compared to 75 and 100 cm row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty cm row spacing gave higher revenue and marginal returns than 75 and 100 cm row spacing.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
50 cm row spacinge1
Outcome
revenue and marginal returnse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
75 and 100 cm row spacinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of 50 cm row spacing reduced the density and biomass of grass weed species including Digitaria horizontalis, Panicum maximum, Cynodon dactylon and Paspalum scrobiculatum with subsequently higher soybean dry matter, seed yield, revenue and marginal returns compared to 75 and 100 cm row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad-leaved weeds (Commelina benghalensis, Gomphrena celosioides and Amaranthus spinosus) were not controlled at 50 cm row spacing compared with 75 and 100 cm.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
row spacinge2
Interactor
Commelina benghalensis, Gomphrena celosioides and Amaranthus spinosusCommelina benghalensisAmaranthus spinosusGomphrena celosioidese2weed
Outcome
controllede2
Direction
not controllede2
Comparator
75 and 100 cm row spacinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Commelina benghalensis
Commelina benghalensis · InteractorHerb Pilcher, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus spinosus
Amaranthus spinosus · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gomphrena celosioides
Gomphrena celosioides · InteractorPaul venter · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, some broad-leaved weed species like Commelina benghalensis, Gomphrena celosioides and Amaranthus spinosus were not controlled at 50 compared to 75 and 100 cm row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butachlor application plus hoe weeding reduced total weed density and biomass, regardless of row spacing.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
herbicide (butachlor) application plus hoe weedinge3
Interactor
weede3weed
Outcome
total weed density and biomasse3
Direction
reducede3
Qualifier
Regardless of row spacinge3
Comparator
two hoe weedings or sole herbicide applicatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“Regardless of row spacing, herbicide (butachlor) application plus hoe weeding reduced total weed density and biomass with subsequently higher soybean dry matter, seed yield, revenue and marginal returns than two hoe weedings or sole herbicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butachlor application plus hoe weeding gave higher soybean dry matter and seed yield than two hoe weedings or sole herbicide application.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
herbicide (butachlor) application plus hoe weedinge3
Outcome
soybean dry matter, seed yielde3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
two hoe weedings or sole herbicide applicatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“Regardless of row spacing, herbicide (butachlor) application plus hoe weeding reduced total weed density and biomass with subsequently higher soybean dry matter, seed yield, revenue and marginal returns than two hoe weedings or sole herbicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butachlor application plus hoe weeding gave higher revenue and marginal returns than two hoe weedings or sole herbicide application.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
herbicide (butachlor) application plus hoe weedinge3
Outcome
revenue and marginal returnse3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
two hoe weedings or sole herbicide applicatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in soybean (Glycine max L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“Regardless of row spacing, herbicide (butachlor) application plus hoe weeding reduced total weed density and biomass with subsequently higher soybean dry matter, seed yield, revenue and marginal returns than two hoe weedings or sole herbicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–982 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow row spacing of 50 cm and integrated weed control by butachlor plus hoe weeding will improve weed control efficiency, productivity and profitability of soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe4
Treatment
narrow row spacing of 50 cme4
Outcome
improve weed control efficiency, productivity and profitabilitye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The result suggests that narrow row spacing of 50 cm and integrated weed control by butachlor plus hoe weeding will improve weed control efficiency, productivity and profitability of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1174 · show in text ↑

butachlor · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

butachlor · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

density · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 59 positive, 23 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

herbicide · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

297 papers: 258 positive, 39 negative or no effect

257 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

293 papers more in this group

See all 297 papers →

density · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 207 positive, 98 negative or no effect

206 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

herbicide · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

460 papers: 322 positive, 138 negative or no effect

321 papers in the same direction as this paper · 112 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

456 papers more in this group

See all 460 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.