Paper · 2016 · Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor

Selection of some faba bean segregation genotypes in contrasting environments

Ehab El-Harty

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Bulk selection method was used among six faba bean crosses during F3 and F4 generations under drought and/or non-drought conditions.Four methods (M1, was grown under drought in F3 and F4, M2, was grown under drought in F3 and non- drought in F4, M3, was grown under non-drought in F3 and drought in F4 and M4, was grown under non-drought in F3 and F4) were formed from each cross in F5and evaluatedin two open field experiments (under drought and non-drought conditions). The experiments were planted in split plotdesign with crosses in main plots and selection methods in sup plots. Highly significant differences among crosses and methods and their interactions were reported by combined analysis of both environments.Drought harmful faba bean traits and seed yield decreased from 53.5 to 74.4%. Under drought stress, M1 selection method produced the highest seed yield andcrosses of Hassawi2 by Luz and by TW had the highest seed yield/plant 15.4 and 13.3g, respectively. On the other side M4 was the best selection method for non-stress conditionsand TW x Hassawi2, TW x Hassawi3 and Luz x Hassawi3 recorded highest seed yield 41.7, 37.9 and 37.3g, respectively. High values of PCV, GCV for M4under non-drought suggested that bulk selection under favorite conditions increased the phenotypic and genotypic variance, particularly under same conditions. heritabilityvalues were higher for each selection method under conditions that breed for it indicating that, selected high yields under specific condition may be combined with sensitive alleles to other condition.Plants exposed to different conditions of drought and non-stress during the previous generations (M2 and M3) were had less response to environments changes with low seed yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crosses, selection methods, and their interactions differed significantly across environments.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
differences among crosses and methods and their interactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highly significant differences among crosses and methods and their interactions were reported by combined analysis of both environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced faba bean traits and seed yield by 53.5 to 74.4%.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
faba bean traits and seed yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
53.5 to 74.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought harmful faba bean traits and seed yield decreased from 53.5 to 74.4%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–797 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, M1 had the highest seed yield.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
M1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
Under drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought stress, M1 selection method produced the highest seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, the Hassawi2 by Luz cross yielded 15.4 g seed per plant.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Hassawi2 by Luze0
Outcome
seed yield/plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.4e0
Qualifier
Under drought stresse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crosses of Hassawi2 by Luz and by TW had the highest seed yield/plant 15.4 and 13.3g, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–973 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under drought stress, M1 selection method produced the highest seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, the Hassawi2 by TW cross yielded 13.3 g seed per plant.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
TWe0
Outcome
seed yield/plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13.3ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crosses of Hassawi2 by Luz and by TW had the highest seed yield/plant 15.4 and 13.3g, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M4 was the best selection method under non-stress conditions.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
M4e0
Outcome
best selection methode0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M4 was the best selection method for non-stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TW x Hassawi2 had seed yield of 41.7 g under non-stress conditions.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
TW x Hassawi2e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
41.7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TW x Hassawi2, TW x Hassawi3 and Luz x Hassawi3 recorded highest seed yield 41.7, 37.9 and 37.3g, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TW x Hassawi3 had seed yield of 37.9 g under non-stress conditions.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
TW x Hassawi3e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
37.9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TW x Hassawi2, TW x Hassawi3 and Luz x Hassawi3 recorded highest seed yield 41.7, 37.9 and 37.3g, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Luz x Hassawi3 had seed yield of 37.3 g under non-stress conditions.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Luz x Hassawi3e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
37.3ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TW x Hassawi2, TW x Hassawi3 and Luz x Hassawi3 recorded highest seed yield 41.7, 37.9 and 37.3g, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M4 under non-drought had high phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
M4e0
Outcome
PCV, GCVe0
Direction
Highe0
Qualifier
non-droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High values of PCV, GCV for M4under non-drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heritability was higher when a selection method was evaluated in its breeding environment.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
each selection methode0
Outcome
heritabilityvaluese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under conditions that breed for ite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heritabilityvalues were higher for each selection method under conditions that breed for it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M2 and M3 plants had lower response to environmental changes and low seed yield.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
M2 and M3e0
Outcome
response to environments changes with low seed yielde0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants exposed to different conditions of drought and non-stress during the previous generations (M2 and M3) were had less response to environments changes with low seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1745 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–27 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

40 papers: 7 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.