Abstract
Agricultural sector consumes the largest percentage of freshwater to cater to the need for food forever increasing population but the resources like land and water are becoming scares. Therefore, we need to increase water use efficiency by incorporating the modern drip method of irrigation. One of the ways of alleviating water scarcity is by enhancing its use efficiency or productivity. Improving Water use efficiency (WUE) and fertilizer use efficiency in agriculture will require an increase in crop water productivity (an increase in marketable crop yield per unit of water used by plant) and reduction in water losses from the crop root zone. Therefore, this experiment was carried out at Borsi Farm, DauKalyan Singh Agricultural College & Research Station, Bhatapara (IGKV, Raipur) with three different irrigations and fertigation levels to work outcrop water requirement, Water use efficiency and Fertilizer use efficiency. The results of the study revealed that 60 % of cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) water and 80 %water solubilizing fertilizer (WSF) through drip gave the maximum yield of Gladiolus (110119 spikes ha-1) and (110119 corms ha-1), which is 29% more over conventional irrigation. The results also revealed that the water used by the crop was maximum in the conventional method (454.4 mm), water use efficiency was recorded maximum in 60 % CPE water by drip (72.52%), and water-saving also. Similarly, the fertilizer use efficiency (6.39 kg kg-1) and fertilizer saving (73.4%) was observed maximum in 80% WSF by drip.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Combined drip irrigation and fertigation maximized Gladiolus spikes yield at 110119 spikes ha-1.
- Treatment
- 60 % of cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) water and 80 %water solubilizing fertilizer (WSF) through dripe0
- Outcome
- spikese0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 110119 spikes ha-1e0
- Comparator
- conventional irrigatione0
- Setting
- Gladioluse0
GladiolusOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“60 % of cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) water and 80 %water solubilizing fertilizer (WSF) through drip gave the maximum yield of Gladiolus (110119 spikes ha-1) and (110119 corms ha-1), which is 29% more over conventional irrigation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined drip irrigation and fertigation maximized Gladiolus corms yield at 110119 corms ha-1.
- Treatment
- 60 % of cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) water and 80 %water solubilizing fertilizer (WSF) through dripe0
- Outcome
- cormse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 110119 corms ha-1e0
- Comparator
- conventional irrigatione0
- Setting
- Gladioluse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“60 % of cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) water and 80 %water solubilizing fertilizer (WSF) through drip gave the maximum yield of Gladiolus (110119 spikes ha-1) and (110119 corms ha-1), which is 29% more over conventional irrigation.”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined drip treatment yielded 29% more than conventional irrigation.
- Treatment
- 60 % of cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) water and 80 %water solubilizing fertilizer (WSF) through dripe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 29%e0
- Comparator
- conventional irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“60 % of cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) water and 80 %water solubilizing fertilizer (WSF) through drip gave the maximum yield of Gladiolus (110119 spikes ha-1) and (110119 corms ha-1), which is 29% more over conventional irrigation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional irrigation had the highest crop water use, 454.4 mm.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the water used by the crop was maximum in the conventional method (454.4 mm), water use efficiency was recorded maximum in 60 % CPE water by drip (72.52%), and water-saving also.”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation at 60% CPE maximized water use efficiency at 72.52%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the water used by the crop was maximum in the conventional method (454.4 mm), water use efficiency was recorded maximum in 60 % CPE water by drip (72.52%), and water-saving also.”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation at 60% CPE saved water.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the water used by the crop was maximum in the conventional method (454.4 mm), water use efficiency was recorded maximum in 60 % CPE water by drip (72.52%), and water-saving also.”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertigation with 80% WSF maximized fertilizer use efficiency at 6.39 kg kg-1.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the fertilizer use efficiency (6.39 kg kg-1) and fertilizer saving (73.4%) was observed maximum in 80% WSF by drip.”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertigation with 80% WSF maximized fertilizer saving at 73.4%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the fertilizer use efficiency (6.39 kg kg-1) and fertilizer saving (73.4%) was observed maximum in 80% WSF by drip.”
t0“Gladiolus”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · GladiolusPositive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fertilization · yield · GladiolusPositive and negative results
51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- positive
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.