Paper · 2020 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Screening of Worldwide Barley Collection for Drought Tolerance: The Assessment of Various Physiological Measures as the Selection Criteria

Kangfeng Cai; Xiaohui Chen; Zhigang Han; et al.

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
109
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought is a devastating environmental constraint affecting the agronomic production of barley. To facilitate the breeding process, abundant germplasm resources and reliable evaluation systems to identify the true drought-tolerant barley genotypes are needed. In this study, 237 cultivated and 190 wild barley genotypes, originating from 28 countries, were screened for drought tolerance under the conditions of both water deficit and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-simulated drought at seedling stage. Drought stress significantly reduced the plant growth of all barley genotypes, but no significant difference in drought-induced reduction in the performance of barley seedlings was observed under these two drought conditions. Both cultivated and wild barley subspecies displayed considerable genotypic variability in drought tolerance, which underpinned the identification of 18 genotypes contrasting in drought tolerance. A comparative analysis of drought effects on biomass, water relation, photosynthesis, and osmotic adjustment was undertaken using these contrasting barley genotypes, in order to verify the reliability of the screening and to obtain the credible traits as screening criteria of drought tolerance in barley. As expected, the selected drought-tolerant genotypes showed much less reduction in shoot biomass than drought-sensitive ones under water deficit, which was significantly positively correlated with the results of large-scale screening, confirming the reliability of the screening for drought tolerance under two drought conditions in this study. Likewise, the traits of water relation, photosynthetic activity, and osmotic adjustment differed greatly between the contrasting genotypes under water deficit stress, and they were highly correlated to the growth of barley seedlings, suggesting the potential of them to be the selection criteria for drought tolerance. The analysis of the variable importance of these traits in drought tolerance indicated that sap osmolality and relative water content in the youngest fully-expanded leaf are the suitable selection criteria of screening for drought tolerance in barley at seedling stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced growth across barley genotypes.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced the plant growth of all barley genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two drought conditions did not differ significantly in seedling performance reduction.

Treatment
these two drought conditionse0
Outcome
performance of barley seedlingse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
these two drought conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference in drought-induced reduction in the performance of barley seedlings was observed under these two drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–722 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivated and wild barley varied considerably in drought tolerance.

Material
cultivated and wild barley subspeciese0
Outcome
genotypic variability in drought tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both cultivated and wild barley subspecies displayed considerable genotypic variability in drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–832 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Screening identified 18 genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance.

Outcome
genotypes contrasting in drought tolerancee0
Value
18e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“identification of 18 genotypes contrasting in drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant genotypes had less shoot biomass reduction than sensitive ones under water deficit.

Material
drought-tolerant genotypese0
Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
much less reductione0
Comparator
drought-sensitive onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought-tolerant genotypes showed much less reduction in shoot biomass than drought-sensitive ones under water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot biomass findings correlated positively with the large-scale screen.

Outcome
results of large-scale screeninge0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Comparator
large-scale screeninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was significantly positively correlated with the results of large-scale screening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water relations, photosynthesis, and osmotic adjustment differed between contrasting genotypes.

Material
contrasting genotypese0
Treatment
water deficit stresse0
Outcome
water relation, photosynthetic activity, and osmotic adjustmente0
Direction
differed greatlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the traits of water relation, photosynthetic activity, and osmotic adjustment differed greatly between the contrasting genotypes under water deficit stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those physiological traits correlated highly with barley seedling growth.

Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Outcome
growth of barley seedlingse0
Direction
highly correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they were highly correlated to the growth of barley seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1743–1804 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sap osmolality was identified as a suitable drought-screening criterion.

Outcome
sap osmolalitye0
Qualifier
suitable selection criteriae0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sap osmolality and relative water content in the youngest fully-expanded leaf are the suitable selection criteria of screening for drought tolerance in barley at seedling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2159 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Youngest fully expanded leaf relative water content was identified as a suitable drought-screening criterion.

Outcome
relative water content in the youngest fully-expanded leafe0
Qualifier
suitable selection criteriae0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sap osmolality and relative water content in the youngest fully-expanded leaf are the suitable selection criteria of screening for drought tolerance in barley at seedling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2159 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 15 positive, 90 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

drought · organism · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.