Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Irrigation Schedules and Foliar Application of Potash on Yield and Yield Attributes of Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)

Sonal Athnere; A. K. Kolage; Pinky Yadav; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An agronomic investigation was carried out at Post Graduate Institutional Research Farm, Mahatama Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar, Maharashtra (India) during summer 2018 to study optimum irrigation schedule and the effect of foliar application of potash on growth, yield and quality of summer greengram . The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications. The experiment consists of twelve treatments involving four main plot treatments i.e. irrigation schedules at 40, 60, 80 and at 100 mm CPE and the subplot treatments are foliar application of 1 % potash (KNO3) at flowering, at pod development stage and at flowering and pod development stage. The experimental results revealed that, the maximum consumptive use of water recorded under scheduling of irrigation at 40 mm CPE (305 mm), followed by treatment irrigation at 60 mm CPE (223 mm). Among the different treatments, irrigation at 40 mm CPE recorded significantly higher seed yield (13.31 q ha-1) and yield attributes of summer greengram and it was at par with treatment irrigation at 60 mm CPE (13.08 q ha-1). Foliar application of 1% potash (KNO3) at flowering and at pod development stage recorded significantly higher seed yield (12.42 q ha-1) and yield attributes of summer greengram. The study showed results the irrigation at 60 mm CPE and foliar application of 1% potash at flowering and pod development stage to summer greengram found suitable preposition to achieve highest grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 40 mm CPE gave maximum consumptive water use of 305 mm.

Taxon
Summer GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
Treatment
irrigation at 40 mm CPEe0
Outcome
consumptive use of watere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
305 mme0
Qualifier
223 mme0
Comparator
irrigation at 60 mm CPEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–132 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum consumptive use of water recorded under scheduling of irrigation at 40 mm CPE (305 mm), followed by treatment irrigation at 60 mm CPE (223 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 40 mm CPE produced significantly higher seed yield of 13.31 q ha-1 and was at par with 60 mm CPE at 13.08 q ha-1.

Taxon
summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
irrigation at 40 mm CPEe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
13.31 q ha-1e0
Qualifier
13.08 q ha-1e0
Comparator
irrigation at 60 mm CPEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–132 · show in text ↑
e0

“irrigation at 40 mm CPE recorded significantly higher seed yield (13.31 q ha-1) and yield attributes of summer greengram and it was at par with treatment irrigation at 60 mm CPE (13.08 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 40 mm CPE gave significantly higher yield attributes and was at par with 60 mm CPE.

Taxon
summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
irrigation at 40 mm CPEe0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
irrigation at 60 mm CPEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation at 40 mm CPE recorded significantly higher seed yield (13.31 q ha-1) and yield attributes of summer greengram and it was at par with treatment irrigation at 60 mm CPE (13.08 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 1% potash at flowering and pod development gave significantly higher seed yield of 12.42 q ha-1.

Taxon
summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
Foliar application of 1% potash (KNO3) at flowering and at pod development stagee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.42 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of 1% potash (KNO3) at flowering and at pod development stage recorded significantly higher seed yield (12.42 q ha-1) and yield attributes of summer greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 1% potash at flowering and pod development gave significantly higher yield attributes.

Taxon
summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
Foliar application of 1% potash (KNO3) at flowering and at pod development stagee0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of 1% potash (KNO3) at flowering and at pod development stage recorded significantly higher seed yield (12.42 q ha-1) and yield attributes of summer greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1289 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend irrigation at 60 mm CPE with foliar 1% potash at flowering and pod development for highest grain yield.

Taxon
summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
irrigation at 60 mm CPE and foliar application of 1% potash at flowering and pod development stagee0
Outcome
highest grain yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation at 60 mm CPE and foliar application of 1% potash at flowering and pod development stage to summer greengram found suitable preposition to achieve highest grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1496 · show in text ↑

potassium nitrate · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

stage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 22 positive, 8 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

potassium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 50 positive, 4 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.