Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar 1% potash at flowering and pod development gave significantly higher yield attributes.

A claim from Effect of Irrigation Schedules and Foliar Application of Potash on Yield and Yield Attributes of Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 1% potash at flowering and pod development gave significantly higher yield attributes.

Taxon
summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
Foliar application of 1% potash (KNO3) at flowering and at pod development stagee0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of 1% potash (KNO3) at flowering and at pod development stage recorded significantly higher seed yield (12.42 q ha-1) and yield attributes of summer greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1289

Title

Effect of Irrigation Schedules and Foliar Application of Potash on Yield and Yield Attributes of Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)

Sonal Athnere; A. K. Kolage; Pinky Yadav; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2020. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.906.115

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-71029b40d556b1d0d245352bae45cf85e82d6ca48c22d77256bd0005cdc8fda5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

potassium nitrate · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

stage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 22 positive, 8 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

potassium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 50 positive, 4 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.