Paper · 2020 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effect ofPseudomonas FluorescentRhizobacteria on Growth and Seed Quality in Lentil (Lens CulinarisMedik.)

İrfan Erdemci

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Modern agriculture has become more productive, sustainable, and environmentally friendly. Therefore, the use of rhizobacterial in agriculture for sustainable crop production is becoming more and more important. The present study was aimed to determine the effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens bacterium on the growth of plant, yield and seed nutrient content in lentil (Lens Culinaris Medik.). The field experiments were carried out during two seasons of 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 under the conditions of Southeastern Anatolia of Turkey. The experiment consisted of four Pseudomonas fluorescent (no treatment; inoculated seeds; foliar treatment and inoculated seeds + foliar treatment) applications. The results showed that the application of Pseudomonas fluorescent rhizobacteria had significant effects on plant growth, yield, and yield components and seed nutrient content in lentil. The results also showed that the inoculated seed + foliar application is more important for yield and yield components, and foliar application is more important for seed nutrient content. Consequently, studies on the use of such beneficial microorganisms are necessary for a sustainable ecological agricultural and production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas application significantly affected lentil plant growth.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescent rhizobacteriae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescente1symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Comparator
no treatmente1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Pseudomonas fluorescent rhizobacteria had significant effects on plant growth, yield, and yield components and seed nutrient content in lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–881 · show in text ↑
e1

“four Pseudomonas fluorescent (no treatment; inoculated seeds; foliar treatment and inoculated seeds + foliar treatment) applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas application significantly affected lentil yield and yield components.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescent rhizobacteriae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescente1symbiont
Outcome
yield, and yield componentse0
Comparator
no treatmente1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Pseudomonas fluorescent rhizobacteria had significant effects on plant growth, yield, and yield components and seed nutrient content in lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–881 · show in text ↑
e1

“four Pseudomonas fluorescent (no treatment; inoculated seeds; foliar treatment and inoculated seeds + foliar treatment) applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas application significantly affected lentil seed nutrient content.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescent rhizobacteriae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescente1symbiont
Outcome
seed nutrient contente0
Comparator
no treatmente1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Pseudomonas fluorescent rhizobacteria had significant effects on plant growth, yield, and yield components and seed nutrient content in lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–881 · show in text ↑
e1

“four Pseudomonas fluorescent (no treatment; inoculated seeds; foliar treatment and inoculated seeds + foliar treatment) applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined seed inoculation and foliar application was more important for lentil yield and its components.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
inoculated seed + foliar applicatione0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescente2symbiont
Outcome
yield and yield componentse0
Direction
more importante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inoculated seed + foliar application is more important for yield and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1000 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed nutrient content in lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–881 · show in text ↑
e2

“four Pseudomonas fluorescent (no treatment; inoculated seeds; foliar treatment and inoculated seeds + foliar treatment) applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application was more important for lentil seed nutrient content.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
foliar applicatione0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescente2symbiont
Outcome
seed nutrient contente0
Direction
more importante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application is more important for seed nutrient content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1068 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed nutrient content in lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–881 · show in text ↑
e2

“four Pseudomonas fluorescent (no treatment; inoculated seeds; foliar treatment and inoculated seeds + foliar treatment) applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–694 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors call for further studies on beneficial microorganisms in sustainable production.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Outcome
studies on the use of such beneficial microorganismse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“studies on the use of such beneficial microorganisms are necessary for a sustainable ecological agricultural and production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1208 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed nutrient content in lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–881 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

69 papers: 65 positive, 4 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

application · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.