Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of irrigation and foliar spray of nutrients and growth hormones on growth, yield attributes and yield of lentil

Bharti Sodi; GK Shrivastava; DK Chandrakar; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2017-18 at the Research cum Instructional Farm, under all India Coordinated Research Project on MULLaRP, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, I.G.K.V. Raipur (CG.) on “Effect of irrigation and foliar spray of nutrients and growth hormones on growth, yield attributes and yield of lentil” The experiment was laid out in Strip Plot Design having the combination of fourteen treatments and three replications. The treatment consisted of seven foliar nutrients spray and two irrigation levels. The experiment was comprised of factor A. Horizontal plot (Irrigation level-2) I1-One irrigation (35 DAS), I2-Two irrigation (35 and 65 DAS) B. Vertical plot (Foliar Spray-7) F1-Water Spray, F2-Nitrobenzene @ 0.3%, F3-N: P: K:: 19:19:19 @ 1% solution, F4-Multi micro nutrient (Fe, Mn, Zn, B, Cu, Mo) @ 0.1%, F5-Plant growth hormones mixture (Cytokinins and Enzymes) @ 0.15%, F6-N: P: K:: 19:19:19 @ 1% + Multi micro nutrient (Fe, Mn, Zn, B, Cu, Mo) @ 0.1%, F7-N: P: K:: 19:19:19 + Multi micro nutrients + Plant growth hormones. Significantly maximum seed yield (1189.05 kg ha-1) and stover yield (1955.52 kg ha-1) was observed under the I2-Two irrigation. The minimum seed yield (1041.43 kg ha-1) and stover yield (1595.10 kg ha-1) was observed under the I1-One irrigation due to optimum plant population and superior growth and yield attributes. As regards to foliar spray of nutrient, F7-N: P: K:: 19:19:19 + MMN + PGHM produced significantly higher seed yield (1320.0 kg ha-1) and stover yield (2109.17 kg ha-1) as compare to other foliar spray of nutrients. However, it was at par to treatment F6- N: P: K:: 19:19:19: + MMN. The lowest seed yield (868.33 kg ha-1) and stover yield (1327.83 kg ha-1) was observed with F1-Control (water spray).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations gave maximum seed yield of 1189.05 kg ha-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
I2-Two irrigatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1189.05 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly maximum seed yield (1189.05 kg ha-1) and stover yield (1955.52 kg ha-1) was observed under the I2-Two irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations gave maximum stover yield of 1955.52 kg ha-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
I2-Two irrigatione0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1955.52 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly maximum seed yield (1189.05 kg ha-1) and stover yield (1955.52 kg ha-1) was observed under the I2-Two irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One irrigation gave minimum seed yield of 1041.43 kg ha-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
I1-One irrigatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1041.43 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum seed yield (1041.43 kg ha-1) and stover yield (1595.10 kg ha-1) was observed under the I1-One irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One irrigation gave minimum stover yield of 1595.10 kg ha-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
I1-One irrigatione0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1595.10 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum seed yield (1041.43 kg ha-1) and stover yield (1595.10 kg ha-1) was observed under the I1-One irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F7 spray gave significantly higher seed yield of 1320.0 kg ha-1 than other sprays.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
F7-N: P: K:: 19:19:19 + MMN + PGHMe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1320.0 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
other foliar spray of nutrientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F7-N: P: K:: 19:19:19 + MMN + PGHM produced significantly higher seed yield (1320.0 kg ha-1) and stover yield (2109.17 kg ha-1) as compare to other foliar spray of nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F7 spray gave significantly higher stover yield of 2109.17 kg ha-1 than other sprays.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
F7-N: P: K:: 19:19:19 + MMN + PGHMe0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2109.17 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
other foliar spray of nutrientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F7-N: P: K:: 19:19:19 + MMN + PGHM produced significantly higher seed yield (1320.0 kg ha-1) and stover yield (2109.17 kg ha-1) as compare to other foliar spray of nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F7 was at par with F6 for yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
at pare0
Comparator
F6- N: P: K:: 19:19:19: + MMNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, it was at par to treatment F6- N: P: K:: 19:19:19: + MMN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1685 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water spray had lowest seed yield of 868.33 kg ha-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
F1-Control (water spray)e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
868.33 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest seed yield (868.33 kg ha-1) and stover yield (1327.83 kg ha-1) was observed with F1-Control (water spray)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1803 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water spray had lowest stover yield of 1327.83 kg ha-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
F1-Control (water spray)e0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1327.83 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest seed yield (868.33 kg ha-1) and stover yield (1327.83 kg ha-1) was observed with F1-Control (water spray)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1803 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

application · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.