Paper · 2022 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of Production Components of Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) under Different Resource Constraints Practices

Prateem Bishnu; S.K. Gunri; Manashi Barman

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background: Lentil occupy a unique place in India’s nutritional food security as it’s a major source of proteins for vegetarians, supply twice protein as compare to rice and wheat. India ranked second in terms of production followed by turkey producing 1.06 million tonnes (Annual Rreport DPB, 2016-17). Still lentil production far from its actual position because of farmer’s negligence in terms of fertilizer, irrigation, weeding, plant protection etc. Based on above mention criteria experiment was conducted to find out the production components for optimization of growth and yield of lentil under resource constraints. Methods: Experiment was conducted during winter season of 2016-17 and 2017-18 at the District Seed Farm, Kalyani, under Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia, West Bengal with a view to identify the most appropriate production components of lentil under resource constraints situation. Result: Fertilizer and weeding components were more noticeable effect on plant height and escaping these two components markedly reduce the plant height in all the growth stages. Skipping of individual component like irrigation only did not vary the dry matter production significantly but when it was combined with fertilizer and weeding components the dry matter production reduced significantly. Among the individual component escaping of fertilizer component greatly reduce the number pods plant-1 followed by weeding and irrigation components. Escaping of irrigation either as single component or in combined with weeding and plant protection did not reduce the 1000 seed weight significantly. Yield reduction was significantly noticed with escaping of production component either in single or in combination. 26-28% of yield reduction was found when component like fertilizer was escaped followed by 25-27% when weeding was escaped from full package. But no significant yield reduction was recorded under the FP-Irrigation and FP-Plant protection. The yield reduction was more pronounced (27-32%) when fertilizer along with weeding components was escaped. Weed growth and density increased with increased the crop age and number of weeds m-2 was found maximum at 45 DAS Highest BCR was found under the treatment FP-(weeding + PP).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer and weeding components had a more noticeable effect on lentil plant height.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Fertilizer and weeding componentse1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
more noticeable effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilizer and weeding components were more noticeable effect on plant height and escaping these two components markedly reduce the plant height in all the growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Escaping fertilizer and weeding components markedly reduced lentil plant height in all growth stages.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Organ / stage
all the growth stagese1
Treatment
escaping these two componentse1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
markedly reducee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilizer and weeding components were more noticeable effect on plant height and escaping these two components markedly reduce the plant height in all the growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Skipping irrigation alone did not significantly change dry matter production.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Skipping of individual component like irrigatione2
Outcome
dry matter productione2
Direction
did not varye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–65 · show in text ↑
e2

“Skipping of individual component like irrigation only did not vary the dry matter production significantly but when it was combined with fertilizer and weeding components the dry matter production reduced significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Skipping irrigation combined with fertilizer and weeding components significantly reduced dry matter production.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
combined with fertilizer and weeding componentse2
Outcome
dry matter productione2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–65 · show in text ↑
e2

“Skipping of individual component like irrigation only did not vary the dry matter production significantly but when it was combined with fertilizer and weeding components the dry matter production reduced significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Escaping fertilizer greatly reduced the number of pods per plant.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
escaping of fertilizer componente3
Outcome
number pods plant-1e3
Direction
greatly reducee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–65 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among the individual component escaping of fertilizer component greatly reduce the number pods plant-1 followed by weeding and irrigation components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Escaping irrigation, alone or with weeding and plant protection, did not significantly reduce 1000 seed weight.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
Escaping of irrigation either as single component or in combined with weeding and plant protectione4
Outcome
1000 seed weighte4
Direction
did not reducee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–65 · show in text ↑
e4

“Escaping of irrigation either as single component or in combined with weeding and plant protection did not reduce the 1000 seed weight significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Escaping production components, singly or in combination, significantly reduced lentil yield.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
escaping of production component either in single or in combinatione5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
reductione5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–65 · show in text ↑
e5

“Yield reduction was significantly noticed with escaping of production component either in single or in combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Escaping fertilizer component reduced lentil yield by 26-28%.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
component like fertilizer was escapede6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
yield reductione6
Value
26-28%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–65 · show in text ↑
e6

“26-28% of yield reduction was found when component like fertilizer was escaped followed by 25-27% when weeding was escaped from full package”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Escaping weeding from the full package reduced lentil yield by 25-27%.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
weeding was escapede6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
decreaseinferrede6
Value
25-27%e6
Comparator
full packagee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–65 · show in text ↑
e6

“26-28% of yield reduction was found when component like fertilizer was escaped followed by 25-27% when weeding was escaped from full package”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was not significantly reduced under the FP-Irrigation and FP-Plant protection treatments.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
FP-Irrigation and FP-Plant protectione7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
no significant yield reductione7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–65 · show in text ↑
e7

“But no significant yield reduction was recorded under the FP-Irrigation and FP-Plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1874–1969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Escaping fertilizer along with weeding components produced a more pronounced yield reduction of 27-32%.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
fertilizer along with weeding components was escapede1
Outcome
yield reductione1
Direction
more pronouncede1
Value
27-32%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“The yield reduction was more pronounced (27-32%) when fertilizer along with weeding components was escaped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1971–2077 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed growth and density increased with crop age in lentil.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
crop agee2
Interactor
Weede2weed
Outcome
Weed growth and densitye2
Direction
increasede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–65 · show in text ↑
e2

“Weed growth and density increased with increased the crop age and number of weeds m-2 was found maximum at 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2079–2192 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of weeds m-2 was maximum at 45 DAS in lentil.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
number of weeds m-2e2
Direction
maximume2
Qualifier
at 45 DASe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–65 · show in text ↑
e2

“Weed growth and density increased with increased the crop age and number of weeds m-2 was found maximum at 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2079–2192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The FP-(weeding + PP) treatment gave the highest BCR in lentil.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
FP-(weeding + PP)e3
Outcome
BCRe3
Direction
Higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–65 · show in text ↑
e3

“Highest BCR was found under the treatment FP-(weeding + PP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2193–2252 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

herbicide · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

47 papers: 36 positive, 11 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.