Abstract
Background: Lentil occupy a unique place in India’s nutritional food security as it’s a major source of proteins for vegetarians, supply twice protein as compare to rice and wheat. India ranked second in terms of production followed by turkey producing 1.06 million tonnes (Annual Rreport DPB, 2016-17). Still lentil production far from its actual position because of farmer’s negligence in terms of fertilizer, irrigation, weeding, plant protection etc. Based on above mention criteria experiment was conducted to find out the production components for optimization of growth and yield of lentil under resource constraints. Methods: Experiment was conducted during winter season of 2016-17 and 2017-18 at the District Seed Farm, Kalyani, under Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia, West Bengal with a view to identify the most appropriate production components of lentil under resource constraints situation. Result: Fertilizer and weeding components were more noticeable effect on plant height and escaping these two components markedly reduce the plant height in all the growth stages. Skipping of individual component like irrigation only did not vary the dry matter production significantly but when it was combined with fertilizer and weeding components the dry matter production reduced significantly. Among the individual component escaping of fertilizer component greatly reduce the number pods plant-1 followed by weeding and irrigation components. Escaping of irrigation either as single component or in combined with weeding and plant protection did not reduce the 1000 seed weight significantly. Yield reduction was significantly noticed with escaping of production component either in single or in combination. 26-28% of yield reduction was found when component like fertilizer was escaped followed by 25-27% when weeding was escaped from full package. But no significant yield reduction was recorded under the FP-Irrigation and FP-Plant protection. The yield reduction was more pronounced (27-32%) when fertilizer along with weeding components was escaped. Weed growth and density increased with increased the crop age and number of weeds m-2 was found maximum at 45 DAS Highest BCR was found under the treatment FP-(weeding + PP).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer and weeding components had a more noticeable effect on lentil plant height.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- Fertilizer and weeding componentse1
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- more noticeable effecte1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
e1“Fertilizer and weeding components were more noticeable effect on plant height and escaping these two components markedly reduce the plant height in all the growth stages”
Claim · model-written summary
Escaping fertilizer and weeding components markedly reduced lentil plant height in all growth stages.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarist0 - Organ / stage
- all the growth stagese1
- Treatment
- escaping these two componentse1
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- markedly reducee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
e1“Fertilizer and weeding components were more noticeable effect on plant height and escaping these two components markedly reduce the plant height in all the growth stages”
Claim · model-written summary
Skipping irrigation alone did not significantly change dry matter production.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- Skipping of individual component like irrigatione2
- Outcome
- dry matter productione2
- Direction
- did not varye2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
e2“Skipping of individual component like irrigation only did not vary the dry matter production significantly but when it was combined with fertilizer and weeding components the dry matter production reduced significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Skipping irrigation combined with fertilizer and weeding components significantly reduced dry matter production.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- combined with fertilizer and weeding componentse2
- Outcome
- dry matter productione2
- Direction
- reducede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
e2“Skipping of individual component like irrigation only did not vary the dry matter production significantly but when it was combined with fertilizer and weeding components the dry matter production reduced significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Escaping fertilizer greatly reduced the number of pods per plant.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- escaping of fertilizer componente3
- Outcome
- number pods plant-1e3
- Direction
- greatly reducee3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
e3“Among the individual component escaping of fertilizer component greatly reduce the number pods plant-1 followed by weeding and irrigation components”
Claim · model-written summary
Escaping irrigation, alone or with weeding and plant protection, did not significantly reduce 1000 seed weight.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- Escaping of irrigation either as single component or in combined with weeding and plant protectione4
- Outcome
- 1000 seed weighte4
- Direction
- did not reducee4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
e4“Escaping of irrigation either as single component or in combined with weeding and plant protection did not reduce the 1000 seed weight significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Escaping production components, singly or in combination, significantly reduced lentil yield.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- escaping of production component either in single or in combinatione5
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- reductione5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
e5“Yield reduction was significantly noticed with escaping of production component either in single or in combination”
Claim · model-written summary
Escaping fertilizer component reduced lentil yield by 26-28%.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- component like fertilizer was escapede6
- Outcome
- yielde6
- Direction
- yield reductione6
- Value
- 26-28%e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
e6“26-28% of yield reduction was found when component like fertilizer was escaped followed by 25-27% when weeding was escaped from full package”
Claim · model-written summary
Escaping weeding from the full package reduced lentil yield by 25-27%.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- weeding was escapede6
- Outcome
- yielde6
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede6
- Value
- 25-27%e6
- Comparator
- full packagee6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
e6“26-28% of yield reduction was found when component like fertilizer was escaped followed by 25-27% when weeding was escaped from full package”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield was not significantly reduced under the FP-Irrigation and FP-Plant protection treatments.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- FP-Irrigation and FP-Plant protectione7
- Outcome
- yielde7
- Direction
- no significant yield reductione7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
e7“But no significant yield reduction was recorded under the FP-Irrigation and FP-Plant protection”
Claim · model-written summary
Escaping fertilizer along with weeding components produced a more pronounced yield reduction of 27-32%.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- fertilizer along with weeding components was escapede1
- Outcome
- yield reductione1
- Direction
- more pronouncede1
- Value
- 27-32%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
e1“The yield reduction was more pronounced (27-32%) when fertilizer along with weeding components was escaped”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed growth and density increased with crop age in lentil.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- crop agee2
- Interactor
- Weede2weed
- Outcome
- Weed growth and densitye2
- Direction
- increasede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
e2“Weed growth and density increased with increased the crop age and number of weeds m-2 was found maximum at 45 DAS”
Claim · model-written summary
The number of weeds m-2 was maximum at 45 DAS in lentil.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarist0 - Interactor
- weedse2weed
- Outcome
- number of weeds m-2e2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Qualifier
- at 45 DASe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
e2“Weed growth and density increased with increased the crop age and number of weeds m-2 was found maximum at 45 DAS”
Claim · model-written summary
The FP-(weeding + PP) treatment gave the highest BCR in lentil.
- Taxon
- Lens culinaris
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- FP-(weeding + PP)e3
- Outcome
- BCRe3
- Direction
- Higheste3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”
e3“Highest BCR was found under the treatment FP-(weeding + PP)”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →herbicide · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
95 papers more in this group
See all 99 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.