Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Urea fertilization enhanced lentil yields by 40%.

A claim from Symbiotic Efficiency of Native and Exotic Rhizobium Strains Nodulating Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) in Soils of Southern Ethiopia · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea fertilization enhanced lentil yields by 40%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
urea fertilizatione4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
enhancede4
Value
40%e4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lentil plays a major role”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–25
e4

“Whereas urea fertilization enhanced yields by 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–939

Title

Symbiotic Efficiency of Native and Exotic Rhizobium Strains Nodulating Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) in Soils of Southern Ethiopia

Wondwosen Tena; Endalkachew Wolde-Meskel; Fran Walley Agronomy 2016. doi:10.3390/agronomy6010011

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-b23d3d8a8dc5caf1e4fa728bcc463f580f99fa5ad0f5b32bf8a1144515a6f4c3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

37 papers: 36 positive, 1 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.