Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Lentil growth and yield showed a similar trend.

A claim from Rock phosphate-enriched organic fertilizer with phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms improves nodulation, growth, and yield of legumes · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil growth and yield showed a similar trend.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise2
Treatment
RP-enriched organic fertilizer + PSM2e0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse2
Direction
similar trende2
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In incubation studies, RP-enriched organic fertilizer with PSM2 significantly increased soil aggregate stability (37%) and P-release (2.35 folds) as compared to control, whereas, in pot study, the number and dry weight of nodules plant−1, shoot length, number of pods plant−1, and grain yield of chickpea increased by 23%, 13%, 17%, 15%, and 15% with RP-enriched organic fertilizer + PSM2 compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–788
e2

“A similar trend was observed regarding the growth and yield parameters of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1046

Title

Rock phosphate-enriched organic fertilizer with phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms improves nodulation, growth, and yield of legumes

Allah Ditta; Muhammad Imtiaz; Sajid Mehmood; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2018. doi:10.1080/00103624.2018.1538374

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e8b6d64e45fdcb99198c9bf17ef2e21af2e9c89c8ff1f5973f82f7310c91fb88 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.