Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the seedling qualities and growth of paprika according to various irrigation points (IPs) (30, 40, 50, 60 or 70%) compared to the weight of rockwool cube with 100% water content for raising seedlings of paprika. Growth degree of paprika seedlings was positively correlate with various irrigation points. In particular, paprika seedlings with IP 30-40% and IP 50-70% treatments were significantly higher than those with other treatments. Leaf area of seedlings was 50-100% wider in those with IP 50% and IP 40% treatments than those with other treatments, therefore dry weight was heavier in IP 30-60% treatments. The dry weight of more than IP 50% treatments had no significant differences. Leaf area (Y 1 ) had a significant relation with the irrigation point (x) as Y 1 = 48.311x + 133.7 (R 2 = 0.9116**). Also dry weight (Y 2 ) of the seedlings showed a linear regression equation as Y 2 = 0.1584x + 0.8616 (R 2 = 0.8853*). Considering the leaf area and the dry weight of irrigation points for rising seedlings of paprika in this study, the optimum range of the irrigation points in the water contents of rockwool cube is IP 50%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Paprika seedling growth correlated positively with irrigation point.
Verbatim
e0“Growth degree of paprika seedlings was positively correlate with various irrigation points”
Claim · model-written summary
Seedlings at IP 30-40% and IP 50-70% were significantly higher than other treatments.
Verbatim
e0“paprika seedlings with IP 30-40% and IP 50-70% treatments were significantly higher than those with other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf area was 50-100% wider at IP 50% and IP 40% than other treatments.
Verbatim
e0“Leaf area of seedlings was 50-100% wider in those with IP 50% and IP 40% treatments than those with other treatments”
t0“paprika”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry weight was heavier at IP 30-60%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“dry weight was heavier in IP 30-60% treatments”
t0“paprika”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry weight did not differ significantly above IP 50%.
Verbatim
e0“The dry weight of more than IP 50% treatments had no significant differences”
t0“paprika”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf area related significantly to irrigation point with R squared 0.9116.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“Leaf area (Y 1 ) had a significant relation with the irrigation point (x) as Y 1 = 48.311x + 133.7 (R 2 = 0.9116**)”
t0“paprika”
Claim · model-written summary
Seedling dry weight had a linear regression on irrigation point with R squared 0.8853.
Not reportedTreatmentDirection
Verbatim
e0“Also dry weight (Y 2 ) of the seedlings showed a linear regression equation as Y 2 = 0.1584x + 0.8616 (R 2 = 0.8853*)”
t0“paprika”
Claim · model-written summary
IP 50% was recommended as the optimum irrigation point for paprika seedlings.
Verbatim
e0“the optimum range of the irrigation points in the water contents of rockwool cube is IP 50%”
t0“paprika”