Paper · 2020 · HortScience

Effects of Diffuse Light on Microclimate of Solar Greenhouse, and Photosynthesis and Yield of Greenhouse-grown Tomatoes

Liang Zheng; Qi Zhang; Kexin Zheng; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The application of diffuse light can potentially improve the homogeneity of light distribution and other microclimatic factors such as temperature inside greenhouses. In this study, diffuse light plastic films with different degrees of light diffuseness (20% and 29%) were used as the south roof cover of Chinese solar greenhouses to investigate the spatial distribution of microclimatic factors and their impacts on the growth and yield of tomato. The horizontal and vertical photosynthetic photon flux density ( PPFD ) distributions, air temperature distribution, and leaf temperature distribution inside the canopy, tomato leaf net photosynthesis (P n ), and fruit production during the growth period were determined. The results showed that diffuse light plastic film continuously improved the light distribution in the vertical and horizontal spaces of the crop canopy in terms of light interception and uniformity. A more diffuse light fraction also decreased the air and leaf temperatures of the middle canopy and upper canopy during the summer, thereby promoting the photosynthesis of the tomato plants. P n of the middle and lower canopies with higher haze film were significantly greater than those with lower haze film (19.0% and 27.2%, respectively). The yields of higher stem density and lower stem density planted tomatoes in the 29% haze compartment were increased by 5.5% and 12.9% compared with 20% in the haze group, respectively. Diffuse light plastic films can improve the homogeneity of the canopy light distribution and increase crop production in Chinese solar greenhouses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diffuse light plastic film improved the light distribution in the vertical and horizontal canopy space of tomato, in light interception and uniformity.

Treatment
diffuse light plastic filme3
Outcome
light distributione3
Direction
improvede3
Setting
Chinese solar greenhousese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“their impacts on the growth and yield of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–447 · show in text ↑
e2

“diffuse light plastic films with different degrees of light diffuseness (20% and 29%) were used as the south roof cover of Chinese solar greenhouses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–330 · show in text ↑
e3

“diffuse light plastic film continuously improved the light distribution in the vertical and horizontal spaces of the crop canopy in terms of light interception and uniformity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–919 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A more diffuse light fraction decreased air and leaf temperatures of the middle and upper canopy in summer.

Organ / stage
middle canopy and upper canopye4
Treatment
more diffuse light fractione4
Outcome
air and leaf temperaturese4
Direction
decreasede4
Setting
during the summere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“their impacts on the growth and yield of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–447 · show in text ↑
e4

“A more diffuse light fraction also decreased the air and leaf temperatures of the middle canopy and upper canopy during the summer, thereby promoting the photosynthesis of the tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A more diffuse light fraction promoted photosynthesis of tomato plants.

Treatment
more diffuse light fractione4
Outcome
photosynthesise4
Direction
promotinge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“A more diffuse light fraction also decreased the air and leaf temperatures of the middle canopy and upper canopy during the summer, thereby promoting the photosynthesis of the tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthesis (Pn) of the middle canopy under higher haze film was significantly greater than under lower haze film, by 19.0%.

Organ / stage
middle and lower canopiese5
Treatment
higher haze filme5
Outcome
P ne5
Direction
greatere5
Value
19.0%e5
Comparator
lower haze filme5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“A more diffuse light fraction also decreased the air and leaf temperatures of the middle canopy and upper canopy during the summer, thereby promoting the photosynthesis of the tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1110 · show in text ↑
e5

“P n of the middle and lower canopies with higher haze film were significantly greater than those with lower haze film (19.0% and 27.2%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthesis (Pn) of the lower canopy under higher haze film was significantly greater than under lower haze film, by 27.2%.

Organ / stage
middle and lower canopiese5
Treatment
higher haze filme5
Outcome
P ne5
Direction
greatere5
Value
27.2%e5
Comparator
lower haze filme5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“A more diffuse light fraction also decreased the air and leaf temperatures of the middle canopy and upper canopy during the summer, thereby promoting the photosynthesis of the tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1110 · show in text ↑
e5

“P n of the middle and lower canopies with higher haze film were significantly greater than those with lower haze film (19.0% and 27.2%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomatoes with higher stem density in the 29% haze compartment yielded 5.5% more than those in the 20% haze group.

Treatment
29% haze compartmente6
Outcome
yieldse6
Direction
increasede6
Value
5.5%e6
Qualifier
higher stem densitye6
Comparator
20% in the haze groupe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The yields of higher stem density and lower stem density planted tomatoes in the 29% haze compartment were increased by 5.5% and 12.9% compared with 20% in the haze group, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomatoes with lower stem density in the 29% haze compartment yielded 12.9% more than those in the 20% haze group.

Treatment
29% haze compartmente6
Outcome
yieldse6
Direction
increasede6
Value
12.9%e6
Qualifier
lower stem densitye6
Comparator
20% in the haze groupe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The yields of higher stem density and lower stem density planted tomatoes in the 29% haze compartment were increased by 5.5% and 12.9% compared with 20% in the haze group, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1447 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

113 papers: 65 positive, 48 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.