Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing top-canopy light absorption by 25% augmented tomato canopy photosynthesis by 6% in winter.

A claim from How plant architecture affects light absorption and photosynthesis in tomato: towards an ideotype for plant architecture using a functional–structural plant model · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing top-canopy light absorption by 25% augmented tomato canopy photosynthesis by 6% in winter.

Treatment
light absorption in the top part of the canopy was increased by 25 %e0
Outcome
Photosynthesise0
Direction
augmentede0
Value
6 %e0
Qualifier
wintere0
Comparator
not changing light absorption of the canopy as a wholee0
Setting
greenhouse-growne1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthesis was augmented by 6 % in winter and reduced by 7 % in summer, when light absorption in the top part of the canopy was increased by 25 %, while not changing light absorption of the canopy as a whole.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1154
e1

“Simulations were performed with an FSPM of a greenhouse-grown tomato crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–569

Title

How plant architecture affects light absorption and photosynthesis in tomato: towards an ideotype for plant architecture using a functional–structural plant model

V. Sarlikioti; P. H. B. de Visser; G. H. Buck-Sorlin; et al. Annals of Botany 2011. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr221

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-fa1420e3555e18e3869ec018ee4f9d27fcc8e2c3409cd326442afd4ac118ff28 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

113 papers: 65 positive, 48 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

104 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.