Claim · model-written summary
Leaf phyllotaxis had no effect on tomato light absorption or photosynthesis.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume2 - Organ / stage
- phyllotaxise0
- Outcome
- light absorption and photosynthesise1
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“phyllotaxis had no effect”
e1“for both light absorption and photosynthesis while phyllotaxis had no effect”
e2“greenhouse-grown tomato crop”
Title
V. Sarlikioti; P. H. B. de Visser; G. H. Buck-Sorlin; et al. Annals of Botany 2011. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr221
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Increasing top-canopy light absorption by 25% augmented tomato canopy photosynthesis by 6% in winter.
- Intervention effect The same 25% top-canopy light increase reduced tomato canopy photosynthesis by 7% in summer.
- Observation Measured tomato leaf elevation angle, leaflet angle and leaflet arrangement were already optimal for light absorption and photosynthesis.
- Intervention effect Increasing tomato leaf length-to-width ratio by 1.5 increased light absorption and photosynthesis by 6–10%.
- Intervention effect Increasing tomato internode length from 7 to 12 cm increased light absorption and photosynthesis by 6–10%.
- Intervention effect Deeper light penetration improved tomato photosynthesis at summer light intensities, but not at winter light intensities.
- Intervention effect A spacious tomato ideotype with long internodes and long, narrow leaves increased crop photosynthesis by up to 10%.