Claim · model-written summary
Measured tomato leaf elevation angle, leaflet angle and leaflet arrangement were already optimal for light absorption and photosynthesis.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume1 - Organ / stage
- leaf elevation angle, leaflet angle and leaflet arrangemente0
- Outcome
- light absorption and photosynthesise0
- Direction
- optimale0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The measured plant structure was already optimal with respect to leaf elevation angle, leaflet angle and leaflet arrangement for both light absorption and photosynthesis”
e1“greenhouse-grown tomato crop”
Title
V. Sarlikioti; P. H. B. de Visser; G. H. Buck-Sorlin; et al. Annals of Botany 2011. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr221
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Increasing top-canopy light absorption by 25% augmented tomato canopy photosynthesis by 6% in winter.
- Intervention effect The same 25% top-canopy light increase reduced tomato canopy photosynthesis by 7% in summer.
- Observation Leaf phyllotaxis had no effect on tomato light absorption or photosynthesis.
- Intervention effect Increasing tomato leaf length-to-width ratio by 1.5 increased light absorption and photosynthesis by 6–10%.
- Intervention effect Increasing tomato internode length from 7 to 12 cm increased light absorption and photosynthesis by 6–10%.
- Intervention effect Deeper light penetration improved tomato photosynthesis at summer light intensities, but not at winter light intensities.
- Intervention effect A spacious tomato ideotype with long internodes and long, narrow leaves increased crop photosynthesis by up to 10%.