Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same 25% top-canopy light increase reduced tomato canopy photosynthesis by 7% in summer.

A claim from How plant architecture affects light absorption and photosynthesis in tomato: towards an ideotype for plant architecture using a functional–structural plant model · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The same 25% top-canopy light increase reduced tomato canopy photosynthesis by 7% in summer.

Treatment
light absorption in the top part of the canopy was increased by 25 %e0
Outcome
Photosynthesise0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7 %e0
Qualifier
summere0
Comparator
not changing light absorption of the canopy as a wholee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthesis was augmented by 6 % in winter and reduced by 7 % in summer, when light absorption in the top part of the canopy was increased by 25 %, while not changing light absorption of the canopy as a whole.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1154
e1

“Simulations were performed with an FSPM of a greenhouse-grown tomato crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–569

Title

How plant architecture affects light absorption and photosynthesis in tomato: towards an ideotype for plant architecture using a functional–structural plant model

V. Sarlikioti; P. H. B. de Visser; G. H. Buck-Sorlin; et al. Annals of Botany 2011. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr221

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-3bbaed76bedf2a159de3d835e3620f4496d9b8d2981f0e44a05c8fd60eaa5b1a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

113 papers: 65 positive, 48 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this claim · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.