Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Deeper light penetration improved tomato photosynthesis at summer light intensities, but not at winter light intensities.

A claim from How plant architecture affects light absorption and photosynthesis in tomato: towards an ideotype for plant architecture using a functional–structural plant model · 2011

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Deeper light penetration improved tomato photosynthesis at summer light intensities, but not at winter light intensities.

Treatment
deeper penetration of light in the canopye0
Outcome
crop photosynthesise0
Direction
improvese0
Qualifier
high light intensities (summer)e0
Comparator
low light intensities (winter)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At high light intensities (summer) deeper penetration of light in the canopy improves crop photosynthesis, but not at low light intensities (winter).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1693
e1

“greenhouse-grown tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–568

Title

How plant architecture affects light absorption and photosynthesis in tomato: towards an ideotype for plant architecture using a functional–structural plant model

V. Sarlikioti; P. H. B. de Visser; G. H. Buck-Sorlin; et al. Annals of Botany 2011. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr221

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-7aff8e99a5bdb738a8e92424026b21777176be7b3dfe1df7ae85ae2e5693b017 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer