Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during rabi seasons of 2016-17to find out the effect of Effect of Different Organic and Inorganic Nitrogenous Fertilizers on growth, yield and Soil properties of Pea” (Pisum sativum L.) at research farm of Uttaranchal (P.G) College of Bio Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dehradun. The experiment compromised of 8 treatments and combination where control (T1), NPK (T2), FYM (T3), Vermicompost (T4), NPK + FYM (T5), NPK + Vermicompost (T6), NPK + FYM + Vermicompost (T7) and FYM + Vermicompost (T8) were applied to all the treatments. The treatments were laid in Randomised Block Design (RBD) with 3 replication of each treatment. The variety of pea used was Arkel. Observations on growth, yield attributing characters and yield recorded and analysed statistically. All the treatments better response to growth and yield attributes over control. Among the various treatment T7 (NPK + FYM + Vermicompost) proved superior with increased plant height, number of leaves per plant, number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, number of seed per pod, seed yield. The treatment T7 also recorded higher value of soil available N, P2O5 and K2O after the crop harvest and lowest was recorded in T1 (control).Next to T7 the treatment T5 (NPK + FYM) showed better response to growth attributes, seed yield and after crop harvest, soil available N, P2O5and K2 than the rest of the treatments. It is concluding that the bio-fertilizer showed the significant difference. It is suggested that bio-fertilizer may be effective not only sustaining crop productivity and in soil health, but also in supplementing chemical fertilizer of crop.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer treatments improved pea growth and yield attributes over control.
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum L.)
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- All the treatmentse0
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributese0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All the treatments better response to growth and yield attributes over control.”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 increased pea plant height and was superior among treatments.
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- T7 (NPK + FYM + Vermicompost)e0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- various treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the various treatment T7 (NPK + FYM + Vermicompost) proved superior with increased plant height, number of leaves per plant, number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, number of seed per pod, seed yield.”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 increased pea number of leaves per plant and was superior among treatments.
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- T7 (NPK + FYM + Vermicompost)e0
- Outcome
- number of leaves per plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- various treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the various treatment T7 (NPK + FYM + Vermicompost) proved superior with increased plant height, number of leaves per plant, number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, number of seed per pod, seed yield.”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 increased pea number of branches per plant and was superior among treatments.
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- T7 (NPK + FYM + Vermicompost)e0
- Outcome
- number of branches per plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- various treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the various treatment T7 (NPK + FYM + Vermicompost) proved superior with increased plant height, number of leaves per plant, number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, number of seed per pod, seed yield.”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 increased pea number of pods per plant and was superior among treatments.
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- T7 (NPK + FYM + Vermicompost)e0
- Outcome
- number of pods per plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- various treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the various treatment T7 (NPK + FYM + Vermicompost) proved superior with increased plant height, number of leaves per plant, number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, number of seed per pod, seed yield.”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 increased pea number of seed per pod and was superior among treatments.
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- T7 (NPK + FYM + Vermicompost)e0
- Outcome
- number of seed per pode0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- various treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the various treatment T7 (NPK + FYM + Vermicompost) proved superior with increased plant height, number of leaves per plant, number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, number of seed per pod, seed yield.”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 increased pea seed yield and was superior among treatments.
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- T7 (NPK + FYM + Vermicompost)e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- various treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the various treatment T7 (NPK + FYM + Vermicompost) proved superior with increased plant height, number of leaves per plant, number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, number of seed per pod, seed yield.”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 had higher postharvest soil available N, P2O5 and K2O than T1.
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- T7e0
- Outcome
- soil available N, P2O5 and K2Oe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- T1 (control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment T7 also recorded higher value of soil available N, P2O5 and K2O after the crop harvest and lowest was recorded in T1 (control).”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 showed a better response in growth attributes than the remaining treatments except T7.
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- T5 (NPK + FYM)e0
- Outcome
- growth attributese0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Next to T7 the treatment T5 (NPK + FYM) showed better response to growth attributes, seed yield and after crop harvest, soil available N, P2O5and K2 than the rest of the treatments.”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 showed a better response in seed yield than the remaining treatments except T7.
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- T5 (NPK + FYM)e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Next to T7 the treatment T5 (NPK + FYM) showed better response to growth attributes, seed yield and after crop harvest, soil available N, P2O5and K2 than the rest of the treatments.”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 showed a better response in soil available N, P2O5and K2 than the remaining treatments except T7.
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- T5 (NPK + FYM)e0
- Outcome
- soil available N, P2O5and K2e0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Next to T7 the treatment T5 (NPK + FYM) showed better response to growth attributes, seed yield and after crop harvest, soil available N, P2O5and K2 than the rest of the treatments.”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest bio-fertilizer can sustain pea productivity and soil health while supplementing chemical fertilizer.
- Taxon
- pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- bio-fertilizere0
- Outcome
- sustaining crop productivity and in soil healthe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It is suggested that bio-fertilizer may be effective not only sustaining crop productivity and in soil health, but also in supplementing chemical fertilizer of crop”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · soil: chemistry · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →fertilization · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
93 papers more in this group
See all 97 papers →fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
215 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
236 papers more in this group
See all 240 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.