Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

In vitro screening of chickpea genotypes for drought related traits using PEG 6000

Rohit .; Anju Arora; RK Panwar; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Chickpea is adversely affected by drought stress at all the growth stages including germination and seedling emergence thereby seedling establishment. An in vitro screening method was used to screen the genotypes for drought tolerance using polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000. Six drought related seedling traits viz. germination percentage, shoot length (cm), root length (cm), shoot-root ratio, number of secondary roots and relative water content were studied in fifteen genotypes including thirteen MAGIC lines and two varieties JG 11 and HC 5. PEG solutions of 3%, 5% and 7% were used to induce different levels of water stress to compare with control (0%). Analysis of variance revealed significant variability among genotypes, different levels of PEG as well as between genotypes and stress levels. In general a decrease in the mean values under subsequent water induced stress was observed as compared to control in all the six traits under study with few exceptions like root length and shoot root ratio. The root of few genotypes viz. M 31, JG 11, HC 5, M 30 and M 27 increased with increase in stress level. Similarly, shoot root ratio also increased in two genotypes namely M 37 and M 32. Considering complex and quantitative nature of drought tolerance, drought related traits were assigned rank score given to each genotype in order of showing increase or minimum decrease in that seedling trait at control and 7% PEG induced stress levels. Total sum of scores over six seedling parameters revealed that JG 11 was most drought tolerant among all fifteen genotypes under study with total score of seventy six, followed by HC 5 whereas M33 was the most susceptible genotype for drought tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes and PEG levels showed significant variability for drought-related seedling traits.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
different levels of PEGe0
Outcome
significant variabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of variance revealed significant variability among genotypes, different levels of PEG as well as between genotypes and stress levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG-induced stress generally decreased germination percentage, shoot length, secondary root number and relative water content compared with control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
water induced stresse0
Outcome
mean valuese0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general a decrease in the mean values under subsequent water induced stress was observed as compared to control in all the six traits under study with few exceptions like root length and shoot root ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length increased with stress in M 31, JG 11, HC 5, M 30 and M 27.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
M 31, JG 11, HC 5, M 30 and M 27e0
Treatment
increase in stress levele0
Outcome
roote0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root of few genotypes viz. M 31, JG 11, HC 5, M 30 and M 27 increased with increase in stress level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot-root ratio increased in M 37 and M 32.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
M 37 and M 32e0
Outcome
shoot root ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot root ratio also increased in two genotypes namely M 37 and M 32”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JG 11 was the most drought-tolerant genotype, scoring seventy six.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
JG 11e0
Outcome
drought tolerante0
Direction
moste0
Value
seventy sixe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“JG 11 was most drought tolerant among all fifteen genotypes under study with total score of seventy six”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HC 5 ranked after JG 11 for drought tolerance.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
HC 5e0
Outcome
drought tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by HC 5 whereas M33 was the most susceptible genotype for drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1703 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M33 was the most drought-susceptible genotype.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
M33e0
Outcome
susceptible genotype for drought tolerancee0
Direction
most susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M33 was the most susceptible genotype for drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1703 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–30 · show in text ↑