Abstract
An experiment laid out in split plot design replicated four times consisted of 12 treatments, having two FYM levels i.e., FYM (10 t/ha), no FYM and six foliar nutrition (0.1% calcium chloride, 0.5% zinc sulphate, 2.0% potassium chloride, 20g/ha ethylene synthesis inhibiter 1- methyl cyclo propane (1-MCP) and water spray at post anthesis stage) along with control as no foliar spray. Soil Appication of 10 t FYM /ha resulted numerically higher value of soil moisture content at different growth stages, emergence count, dry matter, LAI, yield attributes and ultimately grain yield. Physiological response of wheat in terms of chlorophyll content (SPAD value), photosystem II efficiency (Fv/Fm), canopy temperature, leaf temperature and transpiration rate were also numerically superior with FYM application over no FYM application. However values of aforesaid parameters except canopy temperature at 90 and 110 days after sowing were statistically at par. All foliar spray treatments were numerically superior over no foliar spray. However foliar spray of Zinc sulphate (0.5%) at post anthesis resulted highest yield attributes and grain yield and significantly superior to no spray. Among all treatments, FYM+ZnSO4 gave highest cost of cultivation, gross return and net return. There was not significant interaction between FYM and foliar treatments with respect to all the aforesaid parameters.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
FYM gave numerically higher soil moisture content, emergence count and dry matter than no FYM.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 10 t FYM /hae0
- Outcome
- soil moisture content at different growth stages, emergence count, dry mattere0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil Appication of 10 t FYM /ha resulted numerically higher value of soil moisture content at different growth stages, emergence count, dry matter, LAI, yield attributes and ultimately grain yield”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM gave numerically higher LAI, yield attributes and grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- LAI, yield attributes and ultimately grain yielde0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“LAI, yield attributes and ultimately grain yield”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM gave numerically superior chlorophyll content, photosystem II efficiency and canopy temperature.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- FYM applicatione0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll content (SPAD value), photosystem II efficiency (Fv/Fm), canopy temperaturee0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- no FYM applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Physiological response of wheat in terms of chlorophyll content (SPAD value), photosystem II efficiency (Fv/Fm), canopy temperature, leaf temperature and transpiration rate were also numerically superior with FYM application over no FYM application”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM gave numerically superior leaf temperature and transpiration rate.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- FYM applicatione0
- Outcome
- leaf temperature and transpiration ratee0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- no FYM applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“leaf temperature and transpiration rate were also numerically superior with FYM application over no FYM application”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The reported FYM responses were statistically at par except canopy temperature at 90 and 110 days after sowing.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- values of aforesaid parameterse0
- Qualifier
- except canopy temperature at 90 and 110 days after sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However values of aforesaid parameters except canopy temperature at 90 and 110 days after sowing were statistically at par”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
All foliar sprays were numerically superior to no foliar spray.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- foliar spray treatmentse0
- Outcome
- numerically superiore0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- no foliar spraye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All foliar spray treatments were numerically superior over no foliar spray”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Post anthesis zinc sulphate spray produced the highest yield attributes and grain yield, significantly exceeding no spray.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Zinc sulphate (0.5%) at post anthesise0
- Outcome
- yield attributes and grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- no spraye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar spray of Zinc sulphate (0.5%) at post anthesis resulted highest yield attributes and grain yield and significantly superior to no spray”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus ZnSO4 gave the highest cost of cultivation, gross return and net return.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- FYM+ZnSO4e0
- Outcome
- cost of cultivation, gross return and net returne0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“FYM+ZnSO4 gave highest cost of cultivation, gross return and net return”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM and foliar treatments had no significant interaction for the reported parameters.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- FYM and foliar treatmentse0
- Outcome
- interaction between FYM and foliar treatmentse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was not significant interaction between FYM and foliar treatments with respect to all the aforesaid parameters”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
96 papers more in this group
See all 100 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.