Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during Summer season of 2017 at Instructional Cum Research Farm, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur (C.G.). Effect of growth parameters and yield with basal and foliar nutrition on summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.) grown under Vertisols of Chhattisgarh plain. The treatments comprised of 7 (seven) basal and foliar nutrient application practices viz, RDF (T1), RDF + Rhizobium + PSB + multi micronutrient at flower initiation (T2), T2 + 2% DAP at pod initiation stage (T3), T2 + 2% DAP twice at branching & pod initiation (T4), T2 + 1% NPK 19:19:19 at pod initiation stage (T5), T2 + 1% NPK 19:19:19 twice at branching and pod initiation (T6) and Absolute control (T7). The basal and foliar application of nutrient was found significantly impact on growth parameters (Plant height (cm), Number of branches plant-1, Dry weight of nodules plant-1 (mg), Number of nodules plant-1, Dry weight of nodules plant-1 (mg) and Leaf area index plant-1 under T6 (T2 +1% NPK 19:19:19 twice at branching and pod initiation), which was at par recorded under T5 (T2 +1% NPK 19:19:19 at pod initiation stage), T4 (T2 +2% DAP twice at branching & pod initiation) and T3 (T2 + 2% DAP at pod initiation stage). Significantly highest grain yield and stover yield was noticed in T6 (T2 + 1% NPK 19:19:19 twice at branching and pod initiation) over rest of the treatment, which was at par under recorded T4 (T2 +2% DAP twice at branching & pod initiation) in stover yield. Non significant variation was observed in harvest index.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Basal and foliar nutrient application significantly affected growth parameters of summer greengram.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiata
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatae0 - Treatment
- basal and foliar application of nutriente1
- Outcome
- growth parameterse1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”
e1“The basal and foliar application of nutrient was found significantly impact on growth parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth parameters under T6 were at par with those under T5.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- T2 +1% NPK 19:19:19 twice at branching and pod initiatione2
- Outcome
- growth parameterse1
- Direction
- at pare2
- Comparator
- T5e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”
e1“The basal and foliar application of nutrient was found significantly impact on growth parameters”
e2“under T6 (T2 +1% NPK 19:19:19 twice at branching and pod initiation), which was at par recorded under T5”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T6 gave significantly highest grain yield and stover yield over the rest of the treatments.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- T2 + 1% NPK 19:19:19 twice at branching and pod initiatione3
- Outcome
- grain yield and stover yielde3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”
e3“Significantly highest grain yield and stover yield was noticed in T6 (T2 + 1% NPK 19:19:19 twice at branching and pod initiation) over rest of the treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Stover yield under T4 was at par with T6.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- T2 +2% DAP twice at branching & pod initiatione4
- Outcome
- stover yielde4
- Direction
- at pare4
- Comparator
- T6e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”
e3“Significantly highest grain yield and stover yield was noticed in T6 (T2 + 1% NPK 19:19:19 twice at branching and pod initiation) over rest of the treatment”
e4“which was at par under recorded T4 (T2 +2% DAP twice at branching & pod initiation) in stover yield”
Claim · model-written summary
No significant variation was observed in harvest index of summer greengram.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“summer greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”
e5“Non significant variation was observed in harvest index”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 140 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
141 papers more in this group
See all 145 papers →fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
371 papers more in this group
See all 375 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.