Paper · 2009 · Misr journal of agricultural engineering

BIO- ENGINEERING APPROACH TO EXPLORE GREENHOUSE PLANT RESPONSES TO ROOT ZONE HEATING

G. M. Abdel- Rahman

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present work was carried out through winter seasons 2005-2006 to investigate the effect of root zone heating of plants behavior and yield under greenhouse conditions. This work aimed to explain the increases in plant fresh mass due to root zone heating. The two cultivars of snap beans were used. Seeds were sown directly on 15th of October 2005 to May 2006, respectively. Four treatments were used, hot water tube, plastic mulch, straw mulch and control (without any especial preparation). The average soil temperature recorded for each previously mentioned treatment were 26, 20.8, 19.9and 18.9 oC respectively. Plant growth, yield and quality of pods in addition to carbohydrates and fiber content of pods were determined in response to soil heating treatments compared to the control. Results indicated that using hot water treatment gave the highest mean fresh mass (47 gm/pod), the average leaves numbers (24.17 leaf/ plant), the maximum mean plant height was153 cm and plant dry mass (14.3 gm). The tallest plant height was obtained using plastic mulch treatment. There were no significant differences found in the number of shoots per plant and stem diameter in all treatments. No significant differences were found in pod fresh mass, pod diameter and pod length among treatments. The lowest value of total fiber content of pods was found in straw mulch treatment. The highest value of carbohydrates content of pods (15.6 gm) was observed in hot water tube treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment gave the highest mean pod fresh mass of 47 gm/pod.

Taxon
snap beanse1
Treatment
hot water treatmente0
Outcome
mean fresh masse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
47 gm/pode0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“hot water treatment gave the highest mean fresh mass (47 gm/pod)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment yielded an average of 24.17 leaves per plant.

Taxon
snap beanse1
Treatment
hot water treatmente0
Outcome
average leaves numberse0
Value
24.17 leaf/ plante0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“hot water treatment gave the highest mean fresh mass (47 gm/pod), the average leaves numbers (24.17 leaf/ plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–934 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment produced a maximum mean height of 153 cm.

Taxon
snap beanse1
Treatment
hot water treatmente2
Outcome
mean plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
153 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum mean plant height was153 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–975 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–289 · show in text ↑
e2

“hot water treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment produced plant dry mass of 14.3 gm.

Taxon
snap beanse1
Treatment
hot water treatmente2
Outcome
plant dry masse0
Value
14.3 gme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“plant dry mass (14.3 gm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1004 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–289 · show in text ↑
e2

“hot water treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch produced the tallest plants.

Taxon
snap beanse1
Treatment
plastic mulch treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
talleste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The tallest plant height was obtained using plastic mulch treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1073 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot number and stem diameter did not significantly differ across treatments.

Taxon
snap beanse1
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
number of shoots per plant and stem diametere0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences found in the number of shoots per plant and stem diameter in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod fresh mass, diameter and length did not significantly differ among treatments.

Taxon
snap beanse1
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
pod fresh mass, pod diameter and pod lengthe0
Direction
No significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences were found in pod fresh mass, pod diameter and pod length among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1291 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch gave the lowest pod fiber content.

Taxon
snap beanse1
Treatment
straw mulch treatmente0
Outcome
total fiber content of podse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest value of total fiber content of pods was found in straw mulch treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1375 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water tube treatment gave the highest pod carbohydrate content, 15.6 gm.

Taxon
snap beanse1
Treatment
hot water tube treatmente0
Outcome
carbohydrates content of podse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.6 gme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest value of carbohydrates content of pods (15.6 gm) was observed in hot water tube treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1478 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–289 · show in text ↑

heat · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mulching · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.