Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of different chemical treatments on field performance of sugarcane planting materials

P Sreelatha; V. Umamahesh; D. Subramanyam; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study was aimed at improving growth and development of two planting materials (bud chips and three budded setts) of sugarcane cultivar 2003T121 by pre-planting soaking in growth-promoting chemicals viz Cow dung slurry (20%), Ethereal (100ppm), Calcium chloride (2g/lit), CEPA (5ppm), Calcium chloride+CEPA, along with control and water soaking for 24 hrs. Treated planting materials showed better results in all growth and biochemical attributes. Leaf area index and crop growth rate were found to be more in water soaking (1.33,9.75) and CaCl2+CEPA (1.27,9.68) in three budded setts where as in bud chip raised seedlings LAI was recorded highest with water soaking (0.43) treatment, lowest values were seen in Cow dung slurry (0.22) CGR recorded highest with CaCl2+CEPA (2.61). Reducing sugars and brix values were also recorded high in CaCl2+CEPA (2.87) and T2 Water soaking (2.87) whereas lowest values were recorded in T1 (Control) (1.62)and T3 (Cow dung slurry) (1.74).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated sugarcane planting materials improved growth and biochemical attributes.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Treated planting materialse0
Outcome
growth and biochemical attributese0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Treated planting materials showed better results in all growth and biochemical attributes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–458 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water soaking produced three-budded sett leaf area index of 1.33.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
water soakinge0
Outcome
Leaf area indexe0
Direction
moree0
Value
1.33e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area index and crop growth rate were found to be more in water soaking (1.33,9.75)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water soaking produced three-budded sett crop growth rate of 9.75.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
water soakinge0
Outcome
crop growth ratee0
Direction
moree0
Value
9.75e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area index and crop growth rate were found to be more in water soaking (1.33,9.75)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl2 plus CEPA produced three-budded sett leaf area index of 1.27.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
three budded settse0
Treatment
CaCl2+CEPAe0
Outcome
Leaf area indexe1
Direction
moree1
Value
1.27e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CaCl2+CEPA (1.27,9.68) in three budded setts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf area index and crop growth rate were found to be more”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl2 plus CEPA produced three-budded sett crop growth rate of 9.68.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
three budded settse0
Treatment
CaCl2+CEPAe0
Outcome
crop growth ratee1
Direction
moree1
Value
9.68e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CaCl2+CEPA (1.27,9.68) in three budded setts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf area index and crop growth rate were found to be more”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water soaking gave the highest leaf area index of 0.43 for bud-chip seedlings.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
bud chip raised seedlingse0
Treatment
water soakinge0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.43e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“bud chip raised seedlings LAI was recorded highest with water soaking (0.43) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow dung slurry gave the lowest bud-chip leaf area index, 0.22.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Cow dung slurrye0
Outcome
LAIe1
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.22e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“lowest values were seen in Cow dung slurry (0.22)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“bud chip raised seedlings LAI was recorded highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl2 plus CEPA produced the highest bud-chip crop growth rate of 2.61.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
CaCl2+CEPAe0
Outcome
CGRe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.61e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CGR recorded highest with CaCl2+CEPA (2.61)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl2 plus CEPA and water soaking gave the highest reducing sugars and brix values, 2.87.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
CaCl2+CEPAe0
Outcome
Reducing sugars and brix valuese0
Direction
highe0
Value
2.87e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing sugars and brix values were also recorded high in CaCl2+CEPA (2.87) and T2 Water soaking (2.87)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control and cow dung slurry had the lowest reported sugar and brix values, 1.62 and 1.74 respectively.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
lowest valuese0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.62e0

Verbatim

e0

“lowest values were recorded in T1 (Control) (1.62)and T3 (Cow dung slurry) (1.74)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 42 positive, 7 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.