Abstract
A field experiment was carried out at Experimental Farm, in Al- kalahyn, Al- Hajer village, Qeft, Qena governorate, Egypt during 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 seasons, to evaluate of three planting methods (Drilling, broadcasting and furrows) and three irrigation intervals (21 , 28 and 35 days) on productivity of three wheat cultivars ( Sids 12 –Misr 2 and Giza 168 ). The results showed that exposing wheat plants to drought stress by increasing irrigation intervals significantly decrease (1000-grain weight, grains spike weight, number of spikes/m2, grain yield (ardab/fed) (argab = 150 Kg, fed= feddan= 42002 m² = 0.420 hectares = 1.037 acres), straw yield (ton/fed) and protein %). Irrigation intervals showed highly significant difference in for all characters studies. The highest value resulted from application irrigation intervals at 21 day compare with the other irrigation intervals. Planting methods significantly affected by all a previous characters. The highest value for all studies characters resulted from using drilling method. There were highly significant differences among wheat cultivars for all characters under study. The wheat cultivar sids-12 gave of the highest values of all traits compared to the other wheat cultivars used in both seasons.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Longer irrigation intervals significantly decreased wheat grain weight and grains per spike.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- increasing irrigation intervalse0
- Outcome
- 1000-grain weight, grains spike weighte0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that exposing wheat plants to drought stress by increasing irrigation intervals significantly decrease (1000-grain weight, grains spike weight, number of spikes/m2, grain yield (ardab/fed) (argab = 150 Kg, fed= feddan= 42002 m² = 0.420 hectares = 1.037 acres), straw yield (ton/fed) and protein %).”
Claim · model-written summary
Longer irrigation intervals significantly decreased wheat spike number and grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- increasing irrigation intervalse0
- Outcome
- number of spikes/m2, grain yielde0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that exposing wheat plants to drought stress by increasing irrigation intervals significantly decrease (1000-grain weight, grains spike weight, number of spikes/m2, grain yield (ardab/fed) (argab = 150 Kg, fed= feddan= 42002 m² = 0.420 hectares = 1.037 acres), straw yield (ton/fed) and protein %).”
Claim · model-written summary
Longer irrigation intervals significantly decreased wheat straw yield and protein percentage.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- increasing irrigation intervalse0
- Outcome
- straw yield (ton/fed) and protein %e0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that exposing wheat plants to drought stress by increasing irrigation intervals significantly decrease (1000-grain weight, grains spike weight, number of spikes/m2, grain yield (ardab/fed) (argab = 150 Kg, fed= feddan= 42002 m² = 0.420 hectares = 1.037 acres), straw yield (ton/fed) and protein %).”
Claim · model-written summary
The 21 day irrigation interval gave the highest studied trait values.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation intervals at 21 daye0
- Outcome
- highest valuee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- the other irrigation intervalse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest value resulted from application irrigation intervals at 21 day compare with the other irrigation intervals”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Drilling gave the highest values for all studied traits.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- drilling methode0
- Outcome
- all studies characterse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest value for all studies characters resulted from using drilling method”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat cultivars differed significantly across studied traits.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Outcome
- all characters under studye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There were highly significant differences among wheat cultivars for all characters under study”
Claim · model-written summary
Sids-12 had the highest studied trait values among wheat cultivars in both seasons.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- sids-12e0
- Outcome
- all traitse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- both seasonse0
- Comparator
- the other wheat cultivarse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The wheat cultivar sids-12 gave of the highest values of all traits compared to the other wheat cultivars used in both seasons”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
76 papers more in this group
See all 80 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.