Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 60 ton/ha sediment, 4 kg/fed humate, 10 day irrigation combination gave the highest growth and yield values with stated exceptions.

A claim from Effect of Irrigation Canal Sediments, Humate Fertilizer and Irrigation Interval on Wheat Performance in Desert Soils · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 ton/ha sediment, 4 kg/fed humate, 10 day irrigation combination gave the highest growth and yield values with stated exceptions.

Treatment
60 ton/ha irrigation canal sediments, 4 kg/fed humate fertilizer and 10 days irrigation intervale0
Outcome
growth, yield and yield componentse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
except for number of plants/m 2 in the second season and straw yield in both seasonse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest values of growth, yield and yield components of wheat for both seasons; except for number of plants/m 2 in the second season and straw yield in both seasons, was the interaction effect of application of 60 ton/ha irrigation canal sediments, 4 kg/fed humate fertilizer and 10 days irrigation interval.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1643

Title

Effect of Irrigation Canal Sediments, Humate Fertilizer and Irrigation Interval on Wheat Performance in Desert Soils

Ali Abdalla Mohammed; Asim Osman Elzubeir; Muawia Elbedawi Hamad; et al. Athens Journal of Sciences 2019. doi:10.30958/ajs.6-2-4

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-f511ff0c3e81a014b7c3c0d22ba6503662d4ae4674b170d1ad942747213265b6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Longer irrigation intervals significantly decreased wheat grain weight and grains per spike.

    Effect of planting methods and irrigation intervals on productivity of some bread wheat cultivars · 2020

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Increasing irrigations up to five increased bread wheat yield and its components.

    Productivity, Grain and Dough Quality of Bread Wheat Grown with Different Water Regimes · 2010

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. negative
    Minimum irrigation lowered average winter wheat yield by 14% versus full irrigation.

    Performance of Double‐Cropped Winter Wheat–Summer Maize under Minimum Irrigation in the North China Plain · 2006 · compared with fully irrigated treatment (FI)

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Moderately saline water substituted for good quality water during part of the season maintained total wheat grain yield.

    Time of Salt Stress Affects Growth and Yield Components of Irrigated Wheat · 1994 · compared with good quality water

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Saline irrigation caused soil salinization and reduced wheat growth and yield.

    Effect of Straw Biochar on Soil Properties and Wheat Production under Saline Water Irrigation · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil reduced wheat productivity.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Wastewater irrigation decreased plant height, leaf area and grain yield in wheat.

    Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on Photosynthesis, Growth, and Anatomical Features of Two Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    An additional 33 mm of irrigation did not increase grain yield.

    Source–sink balance and manipulating sink–source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sink-limited in high-rainfall zones · 2010

    Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Current high nitrogen practices do not significantly raise crop yields relative to optimum fertilization.

    Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems · 2009 · compared with knowledge-based optimum N fertilization

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Wheat yield declined by 0.04 Mg ha −1 yr −1 with 75 and 100% N-P-K fertilizer.

    Yield and Soil Nutrient Changes in a Long‐Term Rice‐Wheat Rotation in India · 2002

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    The authors concluded that N fertiliser could not compensate for the yield reduction in canola and wheat due to late sowing.

    Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. I. Dry matter production, grain yield, and yield components · 2001

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Genetic gain in winter wheat yield without fertiliser N was 0.021 t ha −1 y −1, smaller than at 215–250 kg/ha N.

    Responses of grain yield, biomass and harvest index and their rates of genetic progress to nitrogen availability in ten winter wheat varieties · 2006 · compared with 215–250 kg/ha N

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    The fertilizing substances did not significantly change plant yields.

    The influence of chlorothalonil on the activity of soil microorganisms and enzymes · 2018

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Compost did not significantly affect wheat grain yield, biomass or harvest index.

    Responses of Wheat Yield, Macro- and Micro-Nutrients, and Heavy Metals in Soil and Wheat following the Application of Manure Compost on the North China Plain · 2016

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Wheat yields were similar in fertilized fallow and unfertilized green-manure plots.

    Wheat Yields, Nitrogen Uptake, and Soil Moisture Following Winter Legume Cover Crop vs. Fallow · 1998 · compared with unfertilized plots following a green manure crop

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Incorporation timing of feedlot cattle manure had no impact on soil or crop performance.

    Effect of rate, frequency and incorporation of feedlot cattle manure on soil nitrogen availability, crop performance and nitrogen use efficiency in east-central Saskatchewan · 2004

    Opposite direction

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.