Paper · 2020 · EPH - International Journal of Applied Science

PHYTOTOXICITY AND ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY OF CAPPARIS SPINOSA L.

Ali M El-Bakkosh; Farag M Shaieb; Aya M Idrs

12
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

In laboratory bioassays, this study evaluated the phytotoxic potential of Capparis spinosa organs (leaves, fruits and roots) aqueous extracts on germination and seedlings growth of Triticum aestavium and Raphanus sativus. The results suggested that C. spinosa leaf, fruit and roots aqueous extract appeared to have phytotoxic effect on the recipient species compared to control. The germination percentage and all growth parameters of T. aestavium and R. sativus were significantly reduced gradually with the increase of aqueous extract concentration levels. However the reduction was varied and could be parts of the donor species and extract concentration dependent. This study also investigated the antifungal activities of three different solvents (ethanol, methanol and acetone) extracts of C. spinosa organs, these extracts were tested for their toxicity in vitro against Aspergillus niger, Penicillium sp. and Trichoderma viride at concentrations 10% (w/v). All C. spinosa organs extracts had different degrees of antifungal activity against the tested fungi, the highest antifungal activity was recorded for fruit ethanolic extract against Trichoderma whereas, acetone extract was the least effective extract against the tested fungi. Generally, tested fungi Trichoderma and Aspergillus were found to be more sensitive to C. spinosa organs extracts while Penicillium showed high resistance. The C. spinosa fruit ethanolic extract may be recommended as a potent bio-fungicide. Extensive studies should be undertaken for the ethanolic extract of C. spinosa organs as a strong antifungal agent against fungal plant diseases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Capparis leaf aqueous extract reduced wheat germination and growth compared with control, increasingly with concentration.

Taxon
T. aestaviume0
Treatment
C. spinosa leafe0
Outcome
germination percentage and all growth parameterse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“C. spinosa leaf, fruit and roots aqueous extract appeared to have phytotoxic effect on the recipient species compared to control. The germination percentage and all growth parameters of T. aestavium and R. sativus were significantly reduced gradually with the increase of aqueous extract concentration levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Capparis fruit aqueous extract reduced wheat germination and growth compared with control, increasingly with concentration.

Taxon
T. aestaviume0
Treatment
fruite0
Outcome
germination percentage and all growth parameterse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“C. spinosa leaf, fruit and roots aqueous extract appeared to have phytotoxic effect on the recipient species compared to control. The germination percentage and all growth parameters of T. aestavium and R. sativus were significantly reduced gradually with the increase of aqueous extract concentration levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Capparis root aqueous extract reduced wheat germination and growth compared with control, increasingly with concentration.

Taxon
T. aestaviume0
Treatment
roots aqueous extracte0
Outcome
germination percentage and all growth parameterse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“C. spinosa leaf, fruit and roots aqueous extract appeared to have phytotoxic effect on the recipient species compared to control. The germination percentage and all growth parameters of T. aestavium and R. sativus were significantly reduced gradually with the increase of aqueous extract concentration levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Capparis leaf aqueous extract reduced radish germination and growth compared with control, increasingly with concentration.

Taxon
R. sativusRaphanus sativuse0
Treatment
C. spinosa leafe0
Outcome
germination percentage and all growth parameterse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C. spinosa leaf, fruit and roots aqueous extract appeared to have phytotoxic effect on the recipient species compared to control. The germination percentage and all growth parameters of T. aestavium and R. sativus were significantly reduced gradually with the increase of aqueous extract concentration levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Capparis fruit aqueous extract reduced radish germination and growth compared with control, increasingly with concentration.

Taxon
R. sativusRaphanus sativuse0
Treatment
fruite0
Outcome
germination percentage and all growth parameterse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C. spinosa leaf, fruit and roots aqueous extract appeared to have phytotoxic effect on the recipient species compared to control. The germination percentage and all growth parameters of T. aestavium and R. sativus were significantly reduced gradually with the increase of aqueous extract concentration levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Capparis root aqueous extract reduced radish germination and growth compared with control, increasingly with concentration.

Taxon
R. sativusRaphanus sativuse0
Treatment
roots aqueous extracte0
Outcome
germination percentage and all growth parameterse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C. spinosa leaf, fruit and roots aqueous extract appeared to have phytotoxic effect on the recipient species compared to control. The germination percentage and all growth parameters of T. aestavium and R. sativus were significantly reduced gradually with the increase of aqueous extract concentration levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–557 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The phytotoxic reduction varied with donor organ and extract concentration.

Taxon
CAPPARIS SPINOSA L.t0
Treatment
extract concentratione0
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
variede0

Verbatim

e0

“the reduction was varied and could be parts of the donor species and extract concentration dependent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–667 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAPPARIS SPINOSA L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Capparis fruit ethanolic extract had the highest antifungal activity against Trichoderma.

Taxon
CAPPARIS SPINOSA L.t0
Treatment
fruit ethanolic extracte0
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae0
Outcome
antifungal activitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest antifungal activity was recorded for fruit ethanolic extract against Trichoderma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAPPARIS SPINOSA L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetone extract was the least effective against the tested fungi.

Taxon
CAPPARIS SPINOSA L.t0
Treatment
acetone extracte0
Outcome
least effective extracte0
Direction
leaste0

Verbatim

e0

“acetone extract was the least effective extract against the tested fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAPPARIS SPINOSA L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma and Aspergillus were more sensitive to Capparis organ extracts.

Taxon
C. spinosaCapparis spinosae0
Interactor
Trichoderma and AspergillusAspergillusTrichodermae0
Outcome
more sensitivee0
Direction
more sensitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capparis spinosa
Capparis spinosa · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus
Aspergillus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma and Aspergillus were found to be more sensitive to C. spinosa organs extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1356 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium showed high resistance to Capparis organ extracts.

Taxon
CAPPARIS SPINOSA L.t0
Interactor
PenicilliumPenicilliume0
Outcome
high resistancee0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium
Penicillium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMilo Manica · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Penicillium showed high resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAPPARIS SPINOSA L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Capparis fruit ethanolic extract as a biofungicide.

Taxon
C. spinosaCapparis spinosae0
Treatment
fruit ethanolic extracte0
Outcome
potent bio-fungicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capparis spinosa
Capparis spinosa · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The C. spinosa fruit ethanolic extract may be recommended as a potent bio-fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1482 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 53 positive, 99 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.