Paper · 2020 · Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture

Arbuscular mycorrhiza improved drought tolerance of maize seedlings by altering photosystem II efficiency and the levels of key metabolites

Yanbo Hu; Wei Xie; Baodong Chen

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
55
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Water shortage can limit plant growth, which can be ameliorated by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis through physiological and metabolic regulations. Deciphering which physiological and metabolic processes are central for AM-mediated regulations is essential for applications of mycorrhizal biotechnology in dryland agriculture. Methodology In this study, the influence of AM symbiosis on growth performance, photosynthesis, and organ accumulation of key C and N metabolites were assessed by growing maize (Mo17, Lancaster Sure Crop) seedlings inoculated with or without AM fungus ( Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01) under different water regimes in greenhouse. Results Drought stress reduced shoot growth, while AM symbiosis significantly improved growth performances, with significant changes of photochemical processes and organ concentration of the key metabolites. AM symbiosis increased root levels of the metabolites in ornithine cycle and unsaturation of fatty acids regardless of water conditions. Root putrescine (Put) concentration was higher in AM than non-inoculated (NM) plants under well-watered conditions; the conversion of Put via diamine oxidase to γ -aminobutyric acid (GABA) occurred in roots of AM plants under drought stress. Leaf concentration of Put, the tricarboxylic acids, and soluble sugars significantly increased in AM plants under drought stress, showing higher values compared to that of NM plants. Moreover, photosystem II efficiency and chlorophyll concentration were higher in AM than NM plants regardless of water status. Conclusion Fatty acid- and ornithine cycle-related metabolites along with soluble sugars, Put, and GABA were the key metabolites of AM-mediated regulations in response to drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress reduced maize shoot growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Drought stresse1
Outcome
shoot growthe1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing maize (Mo17, Lancaster Sure Crop) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–567 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress reduced shoot growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM symbiosis significantly improved maize growth performance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
inoculated with or without AM funguse0
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01Rhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
growth performancese1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
without AM funguse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing maize (Mo17, Lancaster Sure Crop) seedlings inoculated with or without AM fungus ( Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“AM symbiosis significantly improved growth performances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM symbiosis changed maize photochemical processes and metabolite concentrations.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
inoculated with or without AM funguse0
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01Rhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
photochemical processes and organ concentration of the key metabolitese1
Comparator
without AM funguse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing maize (Mo17, Lancaster Sure Crop) seedlings inoculated with or without AM fungus ( Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“with significant changes of photochemical processes and organ concentration of the key metabolites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM symbiosis increased maize root ornithine-cycle metabolites.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AM symbiosise1
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01Rhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
root levels of the metabolites in ornithine cyclee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
without AM funguse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing maize (Mo17, Lancaster Sure Crop) seedlings inoculated with or without AM fungus ( Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“AM symbiosis increased root levels of the metabolites in ornithine cycle and unsaturation of fatty acids regardless of water conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM symbiosis increased fatty-acid unsaturation in maize roots regardless of water regime.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AM symbiosise1
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01Rhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
unsaturation of fatty acidse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
without AM funguse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing maize (Mo17, Lancaster Sure Crop) seedlings inoculated with or without AM fungus ( Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“AM symbiosis increased root levels of the metabolites in ornithine cycle and unsaturation of fatty acids regardless of water conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Well-watered AM maize had higher root putrescine than noninoculated maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AMe1
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01Rhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
Root putrescine (Put) concentratione1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
well-watered conditionse1
Comparator
non-inoculated (NM) plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing maize (Mo17, Lancaster Sure Crop) seedlings inoculated with or without AM fungus ( Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root putrescine (Put) concentration was higher in AM than non-inoculated (NM) plants under well-watered conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1161 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In drought-stressed AM maize roots, putrescine was converted to GABA through diamine oxidase.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01Rhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Gene
diamine oxidasee1
Compound
Pute1
Outcome
conversion of Put via diamine oxidase to γ -aminobutyric acid (GABA)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing maize (Mo17, Lancaster Sure Crop) seedlings inoculated with or without AM fungus ( Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“the conversion of Put via diamine oxidase to γ -aminobutyric acid (GABA) occurred in roots of AM plants under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-stressed AM maize had significantly higher leaf putrescine than noninoculated maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AM plantse1
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01Rhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
Leaf concentration of Pute1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
NM plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing maize (Mo17, Lancaster Sure Crop) seedlings inoculated with or without AM fungus ( Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf concentration of Put, the tricarboxylic acids, and soluble sugars significantly increased in AM plants under drought stress, showing higher values compared to that of NM plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-stressed AM maize had significantly higher leaf tricarboxylic acids than noninoculated maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AM plantse1
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01Rhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
the tricarboxylic acidse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
NM plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing maize (Mo17, Lancaster Sure Crop) seedlings inoculated with or without AM fungus ( Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf concentration of Put, the tricarboxylic acids, and soluble sugars significantly increased in AM plants under drought stress, showing higher values compared to that of NM plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-stressed AM maize had significantly higher leaf soluble sugars than noninoculated maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AM plantse1
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01Rhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
soluble sugarse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
NM plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing maize (Mo17, Lancaster Sure Crop) seedlings inoculated with or without AM fungus ( Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf concentration of Put, the tricarboxylic acids, and soluble sugars significantly increased in AM plants under drought stress, showing higher values compared to that of NM plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosystem II efficiency was higher in AM than noninoculated maize regardless of water regime.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AMe1
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01Rhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
photosystem II efficiencye1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
NM plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing maize (Mo17, Lancaster Sure Crop) seedlings inoculated with or without AM fungus ( Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“photosystem II efficiency and chlorophyll concentration were higher in AM than NM plants regardless of water status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll concentration was higher in AM than noninoculated maize regardless of water regime.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AMe1
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01Rhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll concentratione1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
NM plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing maize (Mo17, Lancaster Sure Crop) seedlings inoculated with or without AM fungus ( Rhizophagus irregularis Schenck & Smith BGC AH01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“photosystem II efficiency and chlorophyll concentration were higher in AM than NM plants regardless of water status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1597 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Rhizophagus irregularis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mycorrhiza · Rhizophagus irregularis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

drought · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

385 papers: 77 positive, 308 negative or no effect

307 papers in the same direction as this paper · 77 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

381 papers more in this group

See all 385 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.