Abstract
The field experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different planting patterns, times of mechanical weeding and herbicide application for weed control in sugar beet. Planting pattern was designated as the main-plot with varying levels including single row 45 cm width, single row 58 cm width and twin row 62 cm row width; timing of mechanical weed control in three levels consisting of weeding at 4, 10 and 14 leaves stage of sugar beet, and herbicides in two levels as metamitron and triflusulfuron. Timing in terms of mechanical weeding and herbicide application had significant effect on weed reduction. In the majority of the cases, planting pattern effected desirable weed density and biomass reduction. The best results were attained in double-row planting at an inter-row spacing of 62 cm. With regards to time of weeding, the best results were achieved in mechanical weed control at the 4th leaf stage of sugar beet which had the highest reduction on both weed density and biomass. Metamitron+ was the most impactful on weed density and biomass. The sugar beet yield components were affected by weed control treatments but could not reach to the level of significance.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Timing of mechanical weeding and herbicide application had a significant effect on weed reduction in sugar beet.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- mechanical weeding and herbicide applicatione1
- Interactor
- weede1weed
- Outcome
- weed reductione1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different planting patterns, times of mechanical weeding and herbicide application for weed control in sugar beet”
e1“Timing in terms of mechanical weeding and herbicide application had significant effect on weed reduction”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting pattern decreased weed density and biomass in sugar beet in the majority of cases.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- planting patterne2
- Interactor
- weede2weed
- Outcome
- weed density and biomass reductione2
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede2
- Qualifier
- In the majority of the casese2
- Setting
- field experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different planting patterns, times of mechanical weeding and herbicide application for weed control in sugar beet”
e2“In the majority of the cases, planting pattern effected desirable weed density and biomass reduction”
Claim · model-written summary
Double-row planting at an inter-row spacing of 62 cm gave the best results in sugar beet.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- double-row planting at an inter-row spacing of 62 cme3
- Outcome
- best resultse3
- Direction
- beste3
- Setting
- field experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different planting patterns, times of mechanical weeding and herbicide application for weed control in sugar beet”
e3“The best results were attained in double-row planting at an inter-row spacing of 62 cm”
Claim · model-written summary
Mechanical weed control at the 4th leaf stage of sugar beet gave the highest reduction in both weed density and biomass.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise4
- Organ / stage
- 4th leaf stagee4
- Treatment
- mechanical weed controle4
- Interactor
- weede4weed
- Outcome
- reduction on both weed density and biomasse4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Setting
- field experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different planting patterns, times of mechanical weeding and herbicide application for weed control in sugar beet”
e4“With regards to time of weeding, the best results were achieved in mechanical weed control at the 4th leaf stage of sugar beet which had the highest reduction on both weed density and biomass”
Claim · model-written summary
Metamitron+ was the most impactful herbicide treatment on weed density and biomass in sugar beet.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- Metamitron+e5
- Interactor
- weede5weed
- Outcome
- weed density and biomasse5
- Direction
- most impactfule5
- Setting
- field experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different planting patterns, times of mechanical weeding and herbicide application for weed control in sugar beet”
e5“Metamitron+ was the most impactful on weed density and biomass”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed control treatments affected sugar beet yield components without reaching statistical significance.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise6
- Treatment
- weed control treatmentse6
- Outcome
- yield componentse6
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“The sugar beet yield components were affected by weed control treatments but could not reach to the level of significance”
The same questions in other papers
herbicide · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →herbicide · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.