Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Reduced tillage intensity and refusal of full-scale herbicides had a negative but not significant influence on weed infestation, except under no-tillage.

A claim from The effect of conservation primary and zero tillage on soil bulk density, water content, sugar beet growth and weed infestation. · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage intensity and refusal of full-scale herbicides had a negative but not significant influence on weed infestation, except under no-tillage.

Treatment
reduction of soil tillage intensity and refusal to use full-scale herbicidese0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed infestatione0
Direction
negativee0
Qualifier
except in the no-tillage patterne0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of soil tillage intensity and refusal to use full-scale herbicides had negative, but not significant influence on weed infestation in the sugar beet crop, except in the no-tillage pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1884

Title

The effect of conservation primary and zero tillage on soil bulk density, water content, sugar beet growth and weed infestation.

Kęstutis Romaneckas; Regina Romaneckienė; Egidijus Šarauskis; et al. Agronomy Research 2009

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e44590f376c26c0b883bb14dbf44e3d15c0c840e0d43f7573a2167c3f8d12457 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

tillage · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

herbicide · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 50 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.