Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Punch planting with flame weeding reduced intra-row weed densities by 30% in fodder beet compared with normal drilling with flame weeding.

A claim from Punch planting, flame weeding and stale seedbed for weed control in row crops · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Punch planting with flame weeding reduced intra-row weed densities by 30% in fodder beet compared with normal drilling with flame weeding.

Taxon
fodder beete2
Treatment
punch planting with flame weedinge1
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weed densitiese2
Direction
reducede1
Value
30%e2
Comparator
normal drilling with flame weedinge2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e1

“Over all planting times and years, punch planting with flame weeding reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–593
e2

“weed densities by 30% at the two to four leaf stage of fodder beet compared with normal drilling with flame weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–719

Title

Punch planting, flame weeding and stale seedbed for weed control in row crops

J Rasmussen Weed Research 2003. doi:10.1046/j.0043-1737.2003.00357.x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-83410b1c8cef72b3e10dc87a50e5ba9154aa0160e40e112dc6f1f5e56877aaa8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

herbicide · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 50 positive, 13 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.