Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Plant growth promoters effect on cane, quality and yield parameters in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)

P. Sujatha; Bnvs Ravi Kumar; N. V. Naidu; et al.

16
claims
40
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) at 150 ppm showed more percentage of germination at 30 DAP (64) followed by water soaking (59) compared to gibberellic acid (GA3) as 53. GA3 showed statistically significant effect on tillering (73,000/ha) at 75 DAP and shoot population (1, 13,000/ha) at 120 DAP followed by NAA compared to untreated control. GA3 also recorded numerically high cane length, cane girth and single cane weight. Sett treatment showed a significant effect on purity percentage (NAA 150 ppm as 88.43%), cane yield (GA3 150 ppm as 72.60 t/ha) and CCS yield (GA3 150 ppm as 8.27 t/ha) but not on number of millable canes (‘000/ha), brix, pol reading and percent juice sucrose. Foliar application of gibberellic acid 150 ppm at 45 DAP showed high number of millable canes (86,010 /ha), more pol reading (> 69.50) and cane yield (82.4 t/ha). High percent yield increase was observed with plant growth promoters at 45 DAP (6.21) followed by 30 DAP (5.53) compared to 60 DAP (2.23) compared to control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 150 ppm gave 64 percent germination at 30 DAP in sugarcane, higher than GA3 (53).

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) at 150 ppme0
Outcome
percentage of germinatione0
Direction
moree0
Value
64e0
Qualifier
at 30 DAPe0
Comparator
gibberellic acid (GA3)e0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) at 150 ppm showed more percentage of germination at 30 DAP (64) followed by water soaking (59) compared to gibberellic acid (GA3) as 53”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water soaking gave 59 percent germination at 30 DAP in sugarcane, higher than GA3 (53).

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
water soakinge0
Outcome
percentage of germinatione0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
59e0
Qualifier
at 30 DAPe0
Comparator
gibberellic acid (GA3)e0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) at 150 ppm showed more percentage of germination at 30 DAP (64) followed by water soaking (59) compared to gibberellic acid (GA3) as 53”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 had a statistically significant effect on tillering (73,000/ha) at 75 DAP compared with untreated control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
tilleringe0
Value
73,000/hae0
Qualifier
at 75 DAPe0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“GA3 showed statistically significant effect on tillering (73,000/ha) at 75 DAP and shoot population (1, 13,000/ha) at 120 DAP followed by NAA compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 had a statistically significant effect on shoot population (1,13,000/ha) at 120 DAP compared with untreated control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
shoot populatione0
Value
1, 13,000/hae0
Qualifier
at 120 DAPe0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“GA3 showed statistically significant effect on tillering (73,000/ha) at 75 DAP and shoot population (1, 13,000/ha) at 120 DAP followed by NAA compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 also gave numerically high cane length, cane girth and single cane weight.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
cane length, cane girth and single cane weighte0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“GA3 also recorded numerically high cane length, cane girth and single cane weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sett treatment had a significant effect on purity percentage, 88.43% with NAA 150 ppm.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
NAA 150 ppme1
Outcome
purity percentagee1
Value
88.43%e1
Qualifier
Sett treatmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sett treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–437 · show in text ↑
e1

“purity percentage (NAA 150 ppm as 88.43%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sett treatment had a significant effect on cane yield, 72.60 t/ha with GA3 150 ppm.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
GA3 150 ppme1
Outcome
cane yielde1
Value
72.60 t/hae1
Qualifier
Sett treatmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sett treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–437 · show in text ↑
e1

“cane yield (GA3 150 ppm as 72.60 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sett treatment had a significant effect on CCS yield, 8.27 t/ha with GA3 150 ppm.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
GA3 150 ppme1
Outcome
CCS yielde1
Value
8.27 t/hae1
Qualifier
Sett treatmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sett treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–437 · show in text ↑
e1

“CCS yield (GA3 150 ppm as 8.27 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sett treatment had no significant effect on the number of millable canes.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Sett treatmente0
Outcome
number of millable canese1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sett treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–437 · show in text ↑
e1

“but not on number of millable canes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sett treatment had no significant effect on brix, pol reading and percent juice sucrose.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Sett treatmente0
Outcome
brix, pol reading and percent juice sucrosee1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sett treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–437 · show in text ↑
e1

“brix, pol reading and percent juice sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of gibberellic acid 150 ppm at 45 DAP gave a high number of millable canes (86,010/ha).

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Foliar application of gibberellic acid 150 ppm at 45 DAPe0
Outcome
number of millable canese1
Direction
highe1
Value
86,010 /hae1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar application of gibberellic acid 150 ppm at 45 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–740 · show in text ↑
e1

“high number of millable canes (86,010 /ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of gibberellic acid 150 ppm at 45 DAP gave more pol reading (> 69.50).

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Foliar application of gibberellic acid 150 ppm at 45 DAPe0
Outcome
pol readinge1
Direction
moree1
Value
> 69.50e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar application of gibberellic acid 150 ppm at 45 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–740 · show in text ↑
e1

“more pol reading (> 69.50)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of gibberellic acid 150 ppm at 45 DAP gave a cane yield of 82.4 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Foliar application of gibberellic acid 150 ppm at 45 DAPe0
Outcome
cane yielde1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
82.4 t/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar application of gibberellic acid 150 ppm at 45 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–740 · show in text ↑
e1

“cane yield (82.4 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth promoters at 45 DAP gave a 6.21 percent yield increase compared with control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
plant growth promoters at 45 DAPe0
Outcome
percent yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
6.21e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“High percent yield increase was observed with plant growth promoters at 45 DAP (6.21) followed by 30 DAP (5.53) compared to 60 DAP (2.23) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1004 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth promoters at 30 DAP gave a 5.53 percent yield increase compared with control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
plant growth promoterse0
Outcome
percent yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.53e0
Qualifier
30 DAPe0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“High percent yield increase was observed with plant growth promoters at 45 DAP (6.21) followed by 30 DAP (5.53) compared to 60 DAP (2.23) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1004 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth promoters at 60 DAP gave a 2.23 percent yield increase compared with control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
plant growth promoterse0
Outcome
percent yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.23e0
Qualifier
60 DAPe0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“High percent yield increase was observed with plant growth promoters at 45 DAP (6.21) followed by 30 DAP (5.53) compared to 60 DAP (2.23) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1004 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

45 papers: 44 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 42 positive, 7 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

application · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 65 positive, 7 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.