Paper · 2019 · Jurnal Ilmiah Pertanian ( JIPERTA)

Efektivitas aplikasi kompos kulit kopi dan Fungi mikoriza arbuskular terhadap produktivitas jagung manis

Hary Sahputra; Suswati Suswati; Gusmeizal Gusmeizal

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Corn is one of stupple food to support economic growth in North Sumatera. The purpose of this research was to obtain data on the ability of compost derived from coffee husks and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the growth and production of sweet corn plants (Zea mays sccharata Sturt). The method used in this study is a randomized block design (RDB) in factorial, with 2 (two) treatment factors, namely: 1) Factor coffee skin and 2) arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (M), each treatment was repeated two (2) times so that there are 40 experimental plots. The parameters observed are plant height, number of leaves, cob length, sample crop production per plot, crop production per plot, top wet weight, bottom wet weight, percentage of pest attack, colonization of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, effectiveness of treatment application to all parameters. The results obtained from this study were: 1) The giving of coffee skin compost did not significantly affect the parameters of plant height, number of leaves, cob length, sample plant production per plot, crop production per plot, top wet weight and bottom wet weight; 2) The allocation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi has no significant effect on the parameters of observing plant height, number of leaves, cob length, sample plant production per plot, crop production per plot, top wet weight and bottom wet weight; 3) The combination of coffee husks compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi did not significantly affect the parameters of plant height, number of leaves, length of cob, sample crop production per plot, crop production per plot, top wet weight and bottom wet weight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coffee skin compost did not significantly affect plant height, number of leaves and cob length of sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
coffee skin composte1
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves, cob lengthe1
Direction
did not significantly affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth and production of sweet corn plants (Zea mays sccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–283 · show in text ↑
e1

“The giving of coffee skin compost did not significantly affect the parameters of plant height, number of leaves, cob length, sample plant production per plot, crop production per plot, top wet weight and bottom wet weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coffee skin compost did not significantly affect sample plant production and crop production per plot of sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
coffee skin composte1
Outcome
sample plant production per plot, crop production per plote1
Direction
did not significantly affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth and production of sweet corn plants (Zea mays sccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–283 · show in text ↑
e1

“The giving of coffee skin compost did not significantly affect the parameters of plant height, number of leaves, cob length, sample plant production per plot, crop production per plot, top wet weight and bottom wet weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coffee skin compost did not significantly affect top and bottom wet weight of sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
coffee skin composte1
Outcome
top wet weight and bottom wet weighte1
Direction
did not significantly affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth and production of sweet corn plants (Zea mays sccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–283 · show in text ↑
e1

“The giving of coffee skin compost did not significantly affect the parameters of plant height, number of leaves, cob length, sample plant production per plot, crop production per plot, top wet weight and bottom wet weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi had no significant effect on plant height, number of leaves and cob length of sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie2
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie2symbiont
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves, cob lengthe2
Direction
has no significant effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth and production of sweet corn plants (Zea mays sccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–283 · show in text ↑
e2

“The allocation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi has no significant effect on the parameters of observing plant height, number of leaves, cob length, sample plant production per plot, crop production per plot, top wet weight and bottom wet weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi had no significant effect on sample plant and crop production per plot of sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie2
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie2symbiont
Outcome
sample plant production per plot, crop production per plote2
Direction
has no significant effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth and production of sweet corn plants (Zea mays sccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–283 · show in text ↑
e2

“The allocation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi has no significant effect on the parameters of observing plant height, number of leaves, cob length, sample plant production per plot, crop production per plot, top wet weight and bottom wet weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi had no significant effect on top and bottom wet weight of sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie2
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie2symbiont
Outcome
top wet weight and bottom wet weighte2
Direction
has no significant effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth and production of sweet corn plants (Zea mays sccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–283 · show in text ↑
e2

“The allocation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi has no significant effect on the parameters of observing plant height, number of leaves, cob length, sample plant production per plot, crop production per plot, top wet weight and bottom wet weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of coffee husk compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi did not significantly affect plant height, number of leaves and length of cob of sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
combination of coffee husks compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie3
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie3symbiont
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves, length of cobe3
Direction
did not significantly affecte3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth and production of sweet corn plants (Zea mays sccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“The combination of coffee husks compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi did not significantly affect the parameters of plant height, number of leaves, length of cob, sample crop production per plot, crop production per plot, top wet weight and bottom wet weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of coffee husk compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi did not significantly affect sample and crop production per plot of sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
combination of coffee husks compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie3
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie3symbiont
Outcome
sample crop production per plot, crop production per plote3
Direction
did not significantly affecte3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth and production of sweet corn plants (Zea mays sccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“The combination of coffee husks compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi did not significantly affect the parameters of plant height, number of leaves, length of cob, sample crop production per plot, crop production per plot, top wet weight and bottom wet weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of coffee husk compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi did not significantly affect top and bottom wet weight of sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
combination of coffee husks compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie3
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie3symbiont
Outcome
top wet weight and bottom wet weighte3
Direction
did not significantly affecte3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth and production of sweet corn plants (Zea mays sccharata Sturt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“The combination of coffee husks compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi did not significantly affect the parameters of plant height, number of leaves, length of cob, sample crop production per plot, crop production per plot, top wet weight and bottom wet weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1630 · show in text ↑

Coffea · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Coffea · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

113 papers: 104 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

188 papers: 169 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 169 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

184 papers more in this group

See all 188 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

168 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,196 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.