Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of restricted irrigation levels on yield attributes and yield of various varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Abhineet; Rajesh Kumar; Sudhakar Singh; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of irrigation levels on performance of timely sown wheat varieties at Crop Research Station Masodha, Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology Kumarganj, Ayodhya 224229 (U.P.) during Rabi 2016-17. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications. The treatment consisted of three irrigation levels (I1- no irrigation, I2- one irrigation at CRI, I3- two irrigations, first at CRI and second at boot leaf stage) in main plots and six varieties viz. HI 1612, HD 2888, C 306, K8027, HD 3171 and K 1317in sub plots. Maximum number of effective tillers (287 m-2), length of ear (8.95 cm), number of grains ear-1 (41.93), grain weight ear-1 (1.43 g), test weight (39.29 g), grain yield (33.18 q ha-1), straw yield (47.53 q ha-1), and biomass yield (80.71 q ha-1) were recorded with variety K 1317 which was at par with HI1612 and significantly superior over rest of the varieties. Regarding irrigation levels, maximum number of effective tillers (314.56 m-2), length of ear (8.97 cm), number of grains ear-1 (44.16), grain weight ear-1 (1.36 g), test weight (38.24 g), grain yield (33.45 q ha-1), straw yield (47.78 q ha-1) and biomass yield (81.23 q ha-1) were recorded with two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage) which was significantly superior than rest of the irrigation levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K 1317 had the maximum number of effective tillers (287 m-2), at par with HI1612 and superior to other varieties.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
K 1317e0
Outcome
number of effective tillerse0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
287 m-2e0
Qualifier
at par with HI1612e0
Comparator
rest of the varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum number of effective tillers (287 m-2), length of ear (8.95 cm), number of grains ear-1 (41.93), grain weight ear-1 (1.43 g), test weight (39.29 g), grain yield (33.18 q ha-1), straw yield (47.53 q ha-1), and biomass yield (80.71 q ha-1) were recorded with variety K 1317 which was at par with HI1612 and significantly superior over rest of the varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K 1317 had the maximum length of ear (8.95 cm), at par with HI1612 and superior to other varieties.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
K 1317e0
Outcome
length of eare0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
8.95 cme0
Qualifier
at par with HI1612e0
Comparator
rest of the varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum number of effective tillers (287 m-2), length of ear (8.95 cm), number of grains ear-1 (41.93), grain weight ear-1 (1.43 g), test weight (39.29 g), grain yield (33.18 q ha-1), straw yield (47.53 q ha-1), and biomass yield (80.71 q ha-1) were recorded with variety K 1317 which was at par with HI1612 and significantly superior over rest of the varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K 1317 had the maximum number of grains ear-1 (41.93), at par with HI1612 and superior to other varieties.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
K 1317e0
Outcome
number of grains ear-1e0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
41.93e0
Qualifier
at par with HI1612e0
Comparator
rest of the varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum number of effective tillers (287 m-2), length of ear (8.95 cm), number of grains ear-1 (41.93), grain weight ear-1 (1.43 g), test weight (39.29 g), grain yield (33.18 q ha-1), straw yield (47.53 q ha-1), and biomass yield (80.71 q ha-1) were recorded with variety K 1317 which was at par with HI1612 and significantly superior over rest of the varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K 1317 had the maximum grain weight ear-1 (1.43 g), at par with HI1612 and superior to other varieties.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
K 1317e0
Outcome
grain weight ear-1e0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
1.43 ge0
Qualifier
at par with HI1612e0
Comparator
rest of the varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum number of effective tillers (287 m-2), length of ear (8.95 cm), number of grains ear-1 (41.93), grain weight ear-1 (1.43 g), test weight (39.29 g), grain yield (33.18 q ha-1), straw yield (47.53 q ha-1), and biomass yield (80.71 q ha-1) were recorded with variety K 1317 which was at par with HI1612 and significantly superior over rest of the varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K 1317 had the maximum test weight (39.29 g), at par with HI1612 and superior to other varieties.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
K 1317e0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
39.29 ge0
Qualifier
at par with HI1612e0
Comparator
rest of the varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum number of effective tillers (287 m-2), length of ear (8.95 cm), number of grains ear-1 (41.93), grain weight ear-1 (1.43 g), test weight (39.29 g), grain yield (33.18 q ha-1), straw yield (47.53 q ha-1), and biomass yield (80.71 q ha-1) were recorded with variety K 1317 which was at par with HI1612 and significantly superior over rest of the varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K 1317 had the maximum grain yield (33.18 q ha-1), at par with HI1612 and superior to other varieties.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
K 1317e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
33.18 q ha-1e0
Qualifier
at par with HI1612e0
Comparator
rest of the varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum number of effective tillers (287 m-2), length of ear (8.95 cm), number of grains ear-1 (41.93), grain weight ear-1 (1.43 g), test weight (39.29 g), grain yield (33.18 q ha-1), straw yield (47.53 q ha-1), and biomass yield (80.71 q ha-1) were recorded with variety K 1317 which was at par with HI1612 and significantly superior over rest of the varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K 1317 had the maximum straw yield (47.53 q ha-1), at par with HI1612 and superior to other varieties.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
K 1317e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
47.53 q ha-1e0
Qualifier
at par with HI1612e0
Comparator
rest of the varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum number of effective tillers (287 m-2), length of ear (8.95 cm), number of grains ear-1 (41.93), grain weight ear-1 (1.43 g), test weight (39.29 g), grain yield (33.18 q ha-1), straw yield (47.53 q ha-1), and biomass yield (80.71 q ha-1) were recorded with variety K 1317 which was at par with HI1612 and significantly superior over rest of the varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K 1317 had the maximum biomass yield (80.71 q ha-1), at par with HI1612 and superior to other varieties.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
K 1317e0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
80.71 q ha-1e0
Qualifier
at par with HI1612e0
Comparator
rest of the varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum number of effective tillers (287 m-2), length of ear (8.95 cm), number of grains ear-1 (41.93), grain weight ear-1 (1.43 g), test weight (39.29 g), grain yield (33.18 q ha-1), straw yield (47.53 q ha-1), and biomass yield (80.71 q ha-1) were recorded with variety K 1317 which was at par with HI1612 and significantly superior over rest of the varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at CRI and boot leaf stage gave maximum number of effective tillers (314.56 m-2), superior to other irrigation levels.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage)e0
Outcome
number of effective tillerse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
314.56 m-2e0
Comparator
rest of the irrigation levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding irrigation levels, maximum number of effective tillers (314.56 m-2), length of ear (8.97 cm), number of grains ear-1 (44.16), grain weight ear-1 (1.36 g), test weight (38.24 g), grain yield (33.45 q ha-1), straw yield (47.78 q ha-1) and biomass yield (81.23 q ha-1) were recorded with two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage) which was significantly superior than rest of the irrigation levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at CRI and boot leaf stage gave maximum length of ear (8.97 cm), superior to other irrigation levels.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage)e0
Outcome
length of eare0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8.97 cme0
Comparator
rest of the irrigation levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding irrigation levels, maximum number of effective tillers (314.56 m-2), length of ear (8.97 cm), number of grains ear-1 (44.16), grain weight ear-1 (1.36 g), test weight (38.24 g), grain yield (33.45 q ha-1), straw yield (47.78 q ha-1) and biomass yield (81.23 q ha-1) were recorded with two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage) which was significantly superior than rest of the irrigation levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at CRI and boot leaf stage gave maximum number of grains ear-1 (44.16), superior to other irrigation levels.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage)e0
Outcome
number of grains ear-1e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
44.16e0
Comparator
rest of the irrigation levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding irrigation levels, maximum number of effective tillers (314.56 m-2), length of ear (8.97 cm), number of grains ear-1 (44.16), grain weight ear-1 (1.36 g), test weight (38.24 g), grain yield (33.45 q ha-1), straw yield (47.78 q ha-1) and biomass yield (81.23 q ha-1) were recorded with two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage) which was significantly superior than rest of the irrigation levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at CRI and boot leaf stage gave maximum grain weight ear-1 (1.36 g), superior to other irrigation levels.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage)e0
Outcome
grain weight ear-1e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.36 ge0
Comparator
rest of the irrigation levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding irrigation levels, maximum number of effective tillers (314.56 m-2), length of ear (8.97 cm), number of grains ear-1 (44.16), grain weight ear-1 (1.36 g), test weight (38.24 g), grain yield (33.45 q ha-1), straw yield (47.78 q ha-1) and biomass yield (81.23 q ha-1) were recorded with two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage) which was significantly superior than rest of the irrigation levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at CRI and boot leaf stage gave maximum test weight (38.24 g), superior to other irrigation levels.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage)e0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
38.24 ge0
Comparator
rest of the irrigation levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding irrigation levels, maximum number of effective tillers (314.56 m-2), length of ear (8.97 cm), number of grains ear-1 (44.16), grain weight ear-1 (1.36 g), test weight (38.24 g), grain yield (33.45 q ha-1), straw yield (47.78 q ha-1) and biomass yield (81.23 q ha-1) were recorded with two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage) which was significantly superior than rest of the irrigation levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at CRI and boot leaf stage gave maximum grain yield (33.45 q ha-1), superior to other irrigation levels.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
33.45 q ha-1e0
Comparator
rest of the irrigation levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding irrigation levels, maximum number of effective tillers (314.56 m-2), length of ear (8.97 cm), number of grains ear-1 (44.16), grain weight ear-1 (1.36 g), test weight (38.24 g), grain yield (33.45 q ha-1), straw yield (47.78 q ha-1) and biomass yield (81.23 q ha-1) were recorded with two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage) which was significantly superior than rest of the irrigation levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at CRI and boot leaf stage gave maximum straw yield (47.78 q ha-1), superior to other irrigation levels.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage)e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
47.78 q ha-1e0
Comparator
rest of the irrigation levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding irrigation levels, maximum number of effective tillers (314.56 m-2), length of ear (8.97 cm), number of grains ear-1 (44.16), grain weight ear-1 (1.36 g), test weight (38.24 g), grain yield (33.45 q ha-1), straw yield (47.78 q ha-1) and biomass yield (81.23 q ha-1) were recorded with two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage) which was significantly superior than rest of the irrigation levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at CRI and boot leaf stage gave maximum biomass yield (81.23 q ha-1), superior to other irrigation levels.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage)e0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
81.23 q ha-1e0
Comparator
rest of the irrigation levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding irrigation levels, maximum number of effective tillers (314.56 m-2), length of ear (8.97 cm), number of grains ear-1 (44.16), grain weight ear-1 (1.36 g), test weight (38.24 g), grain yield (33.45 q ha-1), straw yield (47.78 q ha-1) and biomass yield (81.23 q ha-1) were recorded with two irrigations (first at CRI and second at Boot leaf stage) which was significantly superior than rest of the irrigation levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.