Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Optimizing wheat prosperity: innovative drip irrigation and nitrogen management strategies for enhanced yield and quality of winter wheat in the Huang-Huai-Hai region

Jinke Zhao; Xuexin Xu; Shuai Liu; et al.

19
claims
42
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction: To examine the impacts of varied water and nitroge combinations on wheat yield and quality under drip irrigation in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021. Methods: Traditional irrigation and fertilization methods served as the control (CK), with two nitrogen application rates set: N1 (180 kg/ha) and N2 (210 kg/ha). The irrigation schedules were differentiated by growth stages: jointing, anthesis (S2); jointing, anthesis, and filling (S3); and jointing, booting, anthesis, and filling (S4), at soil depths of 0-10 cm (M1) and 0-20 cm (M2). Results: Results indicated that compared to CK, the 3 and 4 times irrigation treatments comprehensively improved grain yield (GY) by 8.0% and 13.6% respectively, increased the average plant partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer (PFPN) and irrigation use efficiency (IUE) by 57.5% and 38.2%, and 62.2% and 35.8%, respectively. The gluten content (GC) of 3 irrigations was 1.6% higher than CK, and other metrics such as dough tenacity (DT), softness (ST), water absorption (WAS), and gluten hardness (GH) also showed improvements. Furthermore, the contents of amylose, amylopectin, and total starch under 3 irrigations significantly increased by 9.4%, 11.4%, and 9.8%, respectively, with higher than 4 irrigations. The crude protein content and soluble sugar content in 3 irrigations rose by 6.5% and 9.8% respectively over two years. These irrigation treatments also optimized gelatinization characteristics of grains, such as breakdown viscosity (BDV), consistency peak viscosity (CPV), consistency setback viscosity (CSV), pasting temperature (PeT), and pasting time (PaT). Discussion: The study demonstrated that appropriate drip irrigation can effectively synchronize water and nitrogen supply during critical growth stages in winter wheat, ensuring robust late-stage development and efficient transfer of photosynthetic products into the grains, thus enhancing grain mass and yield. This also led to improved utilization of water and fertilizer and enhanced the nutritional and processing quality of the grain. However, excessive irrigation did not further improve grain quality. In conclusion, given the goals of saving water and fertilizer, achieving excellent yield, and ensuring high quality, the N1S3M1 treatment is recommended as an effective production management strategy in the Huang-Huai Hai area; N1S3M2 could be considered in years of water scarcity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations improved grain yield by 8.0% compared with CK.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
3 and 4 times irrigation treatmentse1
Outcome
grain yield (GY)e1
Direction
improvede1
Value
8.0%e1
Comparator
CKe1
Setting
Huang-Huai-Hai areae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“compared to CK, the 3 and 4 times irrigation treatments comprehensively improved grain yield (GY) by 8.0% and 13.6% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–796 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four irrigations improved grain yield by 13.6% compared with CK.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
4 times irrigation treatmentse1
Outcome
grain yield (GY)e1
Direction
improvede1
Value
13.6%e1
Comparator
CKe1
Setting
Huang-Huai-Hai areae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“compared to CK, the 3 and 4 times irrigation treatments comprehensively improved grain yield (GY) by 8.0% and 13.6% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–796 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations increased PFPN by 57.5% compared with CK.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
3 and 4 times irrigation treatmentse1
Outcome
plant partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer (PFPN)e3
Direction
increasede3
Value
57.5%e3
Comparator
CKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“compared to CK, the 3 and 4 times irrigation treatments comprehensively improved grain yield (GY) by 8.0% and 13.6% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–796 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
e3

“increased the average plant partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer (PFPN) and irrigation use efficiency (IUE) by 57.5% and 38.2%, and 62.2% and 35.8%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations increased IUE by 38.2% compared with CK.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
3 and 4 times irrigation treatmentse1
Outcome
irrigation use efficiency (IUE)e3
Direction
increasede3
Value
38.2%e3
Comparator
CKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“compared to CK, the 3 and 4 times irrigation treatments comprehensively improved grain yield (GY) by 8.0% and 13.6% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–796 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
e3

“increased the average plant partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer (PFPN) and irrigation use efficiency (IUE) by 57.5% and 38.2%, and 62.2% and 35.8%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four irrigations increased PFPN by 62.2% compared with CK.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
3 and 4 times irrigation treatmentse1
Outcome
plant partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer (PFPN)e3
Direction
increasede3
Value
62.2%e3
Comparator
CKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“compared to CK, the 3 and 4 times irrigation treatments comprehensively improved grain yield (GY) by 8.0% and 13.6% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–796 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
e3

“increased the average plant partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer (PFPN) and irrigation use efficiency (IUE) by 57.5% and 38.2%, and 62.2% and 35.8%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four irrigations increased IUE by 35.8% compared with CK.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
3 and 4 times irrigation treatmentse1
Outcome
irrigation use efficiency (IUE)e3
Direction
increasede3
Value
35.8%e3
Comparator
CKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“compared to CK, the 3 and 4 times irrigation treatments comprehensively improved grain yield (GY) by 8.0% and 13.6% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–796 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
e3

“increased the average plant partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer (PFPN) and irrigation use efficiency (IUE) by 57.5% and 38.2%, and 62.2% and 35.8%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gluten content under three irrigations was 1.6% higher than CK.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
3 irrigationse5
Outcome
gluten content (GC)e5
Direction
highere5
Value
1.6%e5
Comparator
CKe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The gluten content (GC) of 3 irrigations was 1.6% higher than CK, and other metrics such as dough tenacity (DT), softness (ST), water absorption (WAS), and gluten hardness (GH) also showed improvements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1176 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under three irrigations dough tenacity, softness and water absorption also showed improvements relative to CK.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
3 irrigationse5
Outcome
dough tenacity (DT), softness (ST), water absorption (WAS)e5
Direction
showed improvementse5
Comparator
CKe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The gluten content (GC) of 3 irrigations was 1.6% higher than CK, and other metrics such as dough tenacity (DT), softness (ST), water absorption (WAS), and gluten hardness (GH) also showed improvements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1176 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under three irrigations gluten hardness also showed improvements relative to CK.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
3 irrigationse5
Outcome
gluten hardness (GH)e5
Direction
showed improvementse5
Comparator
CKe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The gluten content (GC) of 3 irrigations was 1.6% higher than CK, and other metrics such as dough tenacity (DT), softness (ST), water absorption (WAS), and gluten hardness (GH) also showed improvements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1176 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amylose content under three irrigations significantly increased by 9.4% compared with four irrigations.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
3 irrigationse4
Outcome
amylosee4
Direction
significantly increasede4
Value
9.4%e4
Comparator
4 irrigationse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“the contents of amylose, amylopectin, and total starch under 3 irrigations significantly increased by 9.4%, 11.4%, and 9.8%, respectively, with higher than 4 irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1360 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amylopectin content under three irrigations significantly increased by 11.4% compared with four irrigations.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
3 irrigationse4
Outcome
amylopectine4
Direction
significantly increasede4
Value
11.4%e4
Comparator
4 irrigationse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“the contents of amylose, amylopectin, and total starch under 3 irrigations significantly increased by 9.4%, 11.4%, and 9.8%, respectively, with higher than 4 irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1360 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total starch under three irrigations significantly increased by 9.8% compared with four irrigations.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
3 irrigationse4
Outcome
total starche4
Direction
significantly increasede4
Value
9.8%e4
Comparator
4 irrigationse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“the contents of amylose, amylopectin, and total starch under 3 irrigations significantly increased by 9.4%, 11.4%, and 9.8%, respectively, with higher than 4 irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1360 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein content under three irrigations rose by 6.5% over two years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
3 irrigationse4
Outcome
crude protein contente4
Direction
rosee4
Value
6.5%e4
Qualifier
over two yearse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The crude protein content and soluble sugar content in 3 irrigations rose by 6.5% and 9.8% respectively over two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1480 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble sugar content under three irrigations rose by 9.8% over two years.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
3 irrigationse4
Outcome
soluble sugar contente4
Direction
rosee4
Value
9.8%e4
Qualifier
over two yearse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The crude protein content and soluble sugar content in 3 irrigations rose by 6.5% and 9.8% respectively over two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1480 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation treatments optimized breakdown, consistency peak and consistency setback viscosity of grain.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
irrigation treatmentse4
Outcome
breakdown viscosity (BDV), consistency peak viscosity (CPV), consistency setback viscosity (CSV)e4
Direction
optimizede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“These irrigation treatments also optimized gelatinization characteristics of grains, such as breakdown viscosity (BDV), consistency peak viscosity (CPV), consistency setback viscosity (CSV), pasting temperature (PeT), and pasting time (PaT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1722 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation treatments optimized pasting temperature and pasting time of grain.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
irrigation treatmentse4
Outcome
pasting temperature (PeT), and pasting time (PaT)e4
Direction
optimizede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“These irrigation treatments also optimized gelatinization characteristics of grains, such as breakdown viscosity (BDV), consistency peak viscosity (CPV), consistency setback viscosity (CSV), pasting temperature (PeT), and pasting time (PaT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1722 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive irrigation did not further improve grain quality.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
excessive irrigatione4
Outcome
grain qualitye4
Direction
did not further improvee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“However, excessive irrigation did not further improve grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2164–2231 · show in text ↑
e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend the N1S3M1 treatment as an effective production management strategy in the Huang-Huai Hai area.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Outcome
N1S3M1 treatmente4
Setting
Huang-Huai Hai areae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
e4

“the N1S3M1 treatment is recommended as an effective production management strategy in the Huang-Huai Hai area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2350–2459 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest N1S3M2 could be considered in years of water scarcity.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Outcome
N1S3M2e4
Qualifier
in years of water scarcitye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–246 · show in text ↑
e4

“N1S3M2 could be considered in years of water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2461–2514 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

80 papers: 50 positive, 30 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

irrigation · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 14 positive, 24 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

irrigation · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 25 positive, 14 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 74 positive, 29 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.