Intervention effectmodel-written summary

An irrigation ratio of 0.9 increased wheat grain yield and soil moisture compared with the stated lower IW/CPE schedules.

A claim from Effect of Irrigation Schedule and Organic Fertilizer on Wheat Yield, Nutrient Uptake, and Soil Moisture in Northwest India · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An irrigation ratio of 0.9 increased wheat grain yield and soil moisture compared with the stated lower IW/CPE schedules.

Treatment
0.9 irrigation water depth/cumulative pan evaporation (I2)e0
Outcome
grain yield, soil moisture contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
0.6 IW/CPE during the vegetative period and 0.8 IW/CPE during the reproductive periode0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an irrigation/water ratio of 0.9 irrigation water depth/cumulative pan evaporation (I2) increased grain yield, soil moisture content, and nutrient uptake of wheat (I3) compared to 0.6 IW/CPE during the vegetative period and 0.8 IW/CPE during the reproductive period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–935

Title

Effect of Irrigation Schedule and Organic Fertilizer on Wheat Yield, Nutrient Uptake, and Soil Moisture in Northwest India

Hanuman Prasad Verma; Om Prakash Sharma; Amar Chand Shivran; et al. Sustainability 2023. doi:10.3390/su151310204

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-36dfdaef4563f0ae2da479477f44ab565bf082a953b64cfbe58e3507419a7cc9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.