Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Test weight and harvest index did not differ significantly among irrigation, fertilizer or inoculation treatments.

A claim from Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield and Yield Attributes and Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Saline and Non-Saline Irrigation Water · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Test weight and harvest index did not differ significantly among irrigation, fertilizer or inoculation treatments.

Treatment
quality of irrigation water, levels of fertilizer and inoculation and vermicompost treatmentse0
Outcome
Test weight (g) and harvest indexe0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Test weight (g) and harvest index did not differ significantly under quality of irrigation water, levels of fertilizer and inoculation and vermicompost treatments during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1100
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–116

Title

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield and Yield Attributes and Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Saline and Non-Saline Irrigation Water

Sunil Kumar; Satya van; Dalip Kumar Bishnoi; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.076

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-6397dbf08a1d8a2f3e5ef50bc6e2a5f0f96fd97f6e3ef0f5ff0aa29e1b0ca137 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Irrigation improved grain test weight.

    Impacts and Limits of Irrigation Water Management on Wheat Yield and Quality · 2017

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Irrigation through booting and flowering increased ash percentage of forage wheat at flowering stage.

    Impact of Different Irrigation Managements on Soil Water Consumption, Grain Yield, Seed Protein, Phosphorus and Potassium of Winter Wheat · 2017

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    An irrigation ratio of 0.9 increased wheat grain yield and soil moisture compared with the stated lower IW/CPE schedules.

    Effect of Irrigation Schedule and Organic Fertilizer on Wheat Yield, Nutrient Uptake, and Soil Moisture in Northwest India · 2023 · compared with 0.6 IW/CPE during the vegetative period and 0.8 IW/CPE during the reproductive period

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Irrigation increased grain yield and test weight.

    Differential Nitrogen and Water Impacts on Yield and Quality of Wheat Classes · 2019

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Split nitrogen application (half after first plus half after second irrigation) gave higher wheat test weight.

    Effect of zero and minimum tillage in conjunction with nitrogen management in wheat (Triticum aestivum) after rice (Oryza sativa) · 2001

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Moderately limited irrigation (treatments B and C) improved grain quality under the experimental conditions.

    Effect of Irrigation Conditions on Protein Composition Accumulation of Grain and Its Quality in Winter Wheat · 2003

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Six irrigations gave test weight of 40.95 g.

    Effect of irrigation levels and moisture conserving polymers on growth, productivity and profitability of wheat · 2019

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Four irrigations were superior for total no of spike per meter length, Grain Weight per panicle, test weight.

    Growth Behavior of Wheat Cultivars under Different Irrigation Levels · 2017

    Opposite direction

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Mycorrhizal inoculation with drought at ambient CO2 improved wheat grain quality parameters.

    Durum wheat quality traits affected by mycorrhizal inoculation, water availability and atmospheric CO2 concentration · 2016

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    PGPM and biochar treatments are suggested to improve wheat grain quality, especially dough viscoelasticity, when grain filling occurred in a dry climate.

    Microbial consortia and biochar as sustainable biofertilisers: Analysis of their impact on wheat growth and production · 2024

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Inoculation maintained wheat grain quality.

    Genomic insights of a native bacterial consortium for wheat production sustainability · 2024

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Associative bacterial strains increased wheat seed quality by 5%.

    ASSOCIATIVE TO TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. BACTERIA AS A SOURCE OF STRAINS FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY OF THE RHIZOSPHERE · 2019

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    T9 gave superior test weight (40.00) compared with other treatments, and was at par with T8.

    Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as Affected by Bio-Fertilizer and Seaweed Extract · 2022 · compared with other treatments

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Treatments with 12.5 and 25% less chemical fertilizer with biofertilizers gave higher grain quality parameters.

    Quality Parameters of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) as Affected by Use of Azotobacter spp and Streptomyces badius · 2020

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    The T8 combined nutrient treatment significantly improved yield-contributing factors of wheat (spike length, grains per spike, test weight) compared with all other treatments.

    Effect of Organic and Inorganic Sources of Nutrients on Growth and Yield of Timely Sown Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2024 · compared with all other treatments

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Biochar and biofertilizer increased soil total porosity and moisture values versus control.

    Enhancing Wheat Productivity by Adding Biochar and Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria (Pseudomonas fluresenc) under Sandy Soil Conditions · 2024 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 119 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 119 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Cumulative manure effects exceeded direct and residual effects for wheat productivity, nutrient uptake, quality, and income.

    Direct, residual and cumulative effects of organic manures and biofertilizers on yields, NPK uptake, grain quality and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under organic farming of rice-wheat cropping system · 2014 · compared with direct and residual effects

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    FYM @ 10 t ha-1 plus vermicompost 1.25 t ha-1 gave the maximum test weight (37.17 g) in wheat.

    Impact of Organic Nutrient Management Practices on Yield Attributes, Yield and Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2019

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  3. positive
    Organic manure enhanced grain quality.

    Comparative Effects of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Soil Organic Carbon and Wheat Productivity under Arid Region · 2020

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Split N application increased test weight at three site-years.

    Timing and Level of Nitrogen Fertility Effects on Spring Wheat Yield in Eastern Canada · 1994 · compared with application of all the fertilizer N at seeding

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Increasing nitrogen increased wheat grain quality indices other than starch content after both forecrops and under both tillage systems.

    Effect of nitrogen fertilization on winter wheat yield and yield quality · 2018

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    The optimum P fertilizer improved weak-gluten wheat grain quality.

    Responses of Phosphorus Use Efficiency, Grain Yield, and Quality to Phosphorus Application Amount of Weak-Gluten Wheat · 2012

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Late S fertilization improved baking quality of wheat.

    Quantitative Protein Composition and Baking Quality of Winter Wheat as Affected by Late Sulfur Fertilization · 2009

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    High N fertilizer application rates significantly improved the baking quality of the flour.

    Progress since the 1930s in Breeding for Yield, its Components, and Quality Traits of Spring Wheat in Finland · 1994

    Opposite direction

145 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.