Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Impact of Organic Nutrient Management Practices on Yield Attributes, Yield and Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Hanuman Prasad Parewa; Moola Ram; Lokesh Kumar Jain; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during rabi 2013-14 and 2014-15 at Agricultural Research Station, Sumerpur, Pali (Rajasthan), India to find out suitable organic nutrient management practices for higher productivity and economics of wheat in Luni basin region of Rajasthan. The experiment was laid out in RBD with seven treatments. The results in terms of growth and yield attributes, grain yield and economics of wheat under different treatments were significantly different than control. Pooled data of two years’ experimentation revealed that the maximum plant height (85.83 cm), number of tillers per meter row length (91.00), number of seed per ear head (55.18), ear head length (9.60 cm), test weight (37.17 g) and grain yield (39.14 q ha-1) were recorded with application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1 followed by treatment FYM @ 5 t ha-1+Neem green leaves @ 2 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1. Net return was recorded significantly highest with FYM @ 10 t ha-1+ Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1whereas B:C ratio (2.43) was highest with FYM @ 5 t ha-1+Neem green leaves @ 2 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1. Application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1+Neem green leaves @ 2 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1 led to increase grain yield by 94.84% significantly over control (19.0 q ha-1). Hence, the finding suggested that the integration of FYM @ 5 t ha-1+Neem green leaves @ 2 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1 increased yields of organic wheat in semi arid regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM @ 10 t ha-1 plus vermicompost 1.25 t ha-1 gave the maximum plant height (85.83 cm) of wheat.

Treatment
FYM @ 10 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1e1
Outcome
maximum plant heighte1
Direction
maximume1
Value
85.83 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum plant height (85.83 cm), number of tillers per meter row length (91.00), number of seed per ear head (55.18), ear head length (9.60 cm), test weight (37.17 g) and grain yield (39.14 q ha-1) were recorded with application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM @ 10 t ha-1 plus vermicompost 1.25 t ha-1 gave the maximum number of tillers per meter row length (91.00) in wheat.

Treatment
FYM @ 10 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1e1
Outcome
number of tillers per meter row lengthe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
91.00e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum plant height (85.83 cm), number of tillers per meter row length (91.00), number of seed per ear head (55.18), ear head length (9.60 cm), test weight (37.17 g) and grain yield (39.14 q ha-1) were recorded with application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM @ 10 t ha-1 plus vermicompost 1.25 t ha-1 gave the maximum number of seeds per ear head (55.18) in wheat.

Treatment
FYM @ 10 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1e1
Outcome
number of seed per ear heade1
Direction
maximume1
Value
55.18e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum plant height (85.83 cm), number of tillers per meter row length (91.00), number of seed per ear head (55.18), ear head length (9.60 cm), test weight (37.17 g) and grain yield (39.14 q ha-1) were recorded with application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM @ 10 t ha-1 plus vermicompost 1.25 t ha-1 gave the maximum ear head length (9.60 cm) in wheat.

Treatment
FYM @ 10 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1e1
Outcome
ear head lengthe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
9.60 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum plant height (85.83 cm), number of tillers per meter row length (91.00), number of seed per ear head (55.18), ear head length (9.60 cm), test weight (37.17 g) and grain yield (39.14 q ha-1) were recorded with application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM @ 10 t ha-1 plus vermicompost 1.25 t ha-1 gave the maximum test weight (37.17 g) in wheat.

Treatment
FYM @ 10 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1e1
Outcome
test weighte1
Direction
maximume1
Value
37.17 ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum plant height (85.83 cm), number of tillers per meter row length (91.00), number of seed per ear head (55.18), ear head length (9.60 cm), test weight (37.17 g) and grain yield (39.14 q ha-1) were recorded with application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM @ 10 t ha-1 plus vermicompost 1.25 t ha-1 gave the maximum grain yield (39.14 q ha-1) in wheat.

Treatment
FYM @ 10 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
39.14 q ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum plant height (85.83 cm), number of tillers per meter row length (91.00), number of seed per ear head (55.18), ear head length (9.60 cm), test weight (37.17 g) and grain yield (39.14 q ha-1) were recorded with application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM @ 10 t ha-1 plus vermicompost 1.25 t ha-1 gave the significantly highest net return in wheat.

Treatment
FYM @ 10 t ha-1+ Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1e2
Outcome
Net returne2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e2

“Net return was recorded significantly highest with FYM @ 10 t ha-1+ Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM @ 5 t ha-1 plus neem green leaves 2 t ha-1 plus vermicompost 1.25 t ha-1 gave the highest benefit-cost ratio (2.43) in wheat.

Treatment
FYM @ 5 t ha-1+Neem green leaves @ 2 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1e3
Outcome
B:C ratioe3
Direction
higheste3
Value
2.43e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“B:C ratio (2.43) was highest with FYM @ 5 t ha-1+Neem green leaves @ 2 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM @ 5 t ha-1 plus neem green leaves 2 t ha-1 plus vermicompost 1.25 t ha-1 increased wheat grain yield by 94.84% significantly over control.

Treatment
FYM @ 5 t ha-1+Neem green leaves @ 2 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1e4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Value
94.84%e4
Qualifier
19.0 q ha-1e4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1+Neem green leaves @ 2 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1 led to increase grain yield by 94.84% significantly over control (19.0 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield attributes, grain yield and economics of wheat differed significantly from control under the different treatments.

Treatment
different treatmentse5
Outcome
growth and yield attributes, grain yield and economicse5
Direction
differente5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
e5

“The results in terms of growth and yield attributes, grain yield and economics of wheat under different treatments were significantly different than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–490 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrating FYM @ 5 t ha-1, neem green leaves 2 t ha-1 and vermicompost 1.25 t ha-1 to increase organic wheat yields in semi-arid regions.

Outcome
integration of FYM @ 5 t ha-1+Neem green leaves @ 2 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1e6
Setting
semi arid regionse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“the finding suggested that the integration of FYM @ 5 t ha-1+Neem green leaves @ 2 t ha-1+Vermicompost @ 1.25 t ha-1 increased yields of organic wheat in semi arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1473 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

botanical · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

140 papers: 123 positive, 17 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

136 papers more in this group

See all 140 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 119 positive, 35 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.